Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:51:28.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The faint-end of galaxy luminosity functions at the Epoch of Reionization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

B. Yue
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100012, China email: yuebin@bao.ac.cn
M. Castellano
Affiliation:
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
A. Ferrara
Affiliation:
Scuola Normale Superiore, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, I-56126 Pisa, Italy Kavli IPMU (WPI), Todai Institutes for Advanced Study, the University of Tokyo, Japan
A. Fontana
Affiliation:
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
E. Merlin
Affiliation:
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
R. Amorín
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 19 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, UK Kavli Institute for Cosmology, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK
A. Grazian
Affiliation:
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
E. Mármol-Queralto
Affiliation:
SUPA, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, U.K.
M. J. Michałowski
Affiliation:
Astronomical Observatory Institute, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, ul. Słoneczna 36, 60-286 Poznań, Poland
A. Mortlock
Affiliation:
SUPA, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, U.K.
D. Paris
Affiliation:
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
S. Parsa
Affiliation:
SUPA, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, U.K.
S. Pilo
Affiliation:
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
P. Santini
Affiliation:
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
M. Di Criscienzo
Affiliation:
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the Epoch of Reionization (EoR), feedback effects reduce the efficiency of star formation process in small halos or even fully quench it. The galaxy luminosity function (LF) may then turn over at the faint-end. We analyze the number counts of z > 5 galaxies observed in the fields of four Frontier Fields (FFs) clusters and obtain constraints on the LF faint-end: for the turn-over magnitude at z ∼ 6, MUVT ≳-13.3; for the circular velocity threshold of quenching star formation process, vc* ≲ 47 km s−1. We have not yet found significant evidence of the presence of feedback effects suppressing the star formation in small galaxies.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Atek, H., Richard, J., Kneib, J.-P., et al. 2015a, ApJ, 800, 18Google Scholar
Atek, H., Richard, J., Jauzac, M., et al. 2015b, ApJ, 814, 69Google Scholar
Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Illingworth, G. D., Ellis, R. S., & Stefanon, M., 2017, ApJ, 843, 129Google Scholar
Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellano, M., Yue, B., Ferrara, A., et al. 2016a, ApJ, 823, L40Google Scholar
Castellano, M., Amorín, R., Merlin, E., et al. 2016b, A&A, 590, A31Google Scholar
Ceverino, D., Glover, S. C. O., & Klessen, R. S., 2017, MNRAS, 470, 2791Google Scholar
Di Criscienzo, M., Merlin, E., Castellano, M., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1706.03790Google Scholar
Gnedin, N. Y., 2016, ApJ, 825, L17Google Scholar
Ishigaki, M., Kawamata, R., Ouchi, M., Oguri, M. & Shimasaku, K. 2017, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1702.04867Google Scholar
Laporte, N., Infante, L., Troncoso Iribarren, P., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 98Google Scholar
Livermore, R. C., Finkelstein, S. L., & Lotz, J. M., 2017, ApJ, 835, 113Google Scholar
Lotz, J. M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 97Google Scholar
Mason, C. A., Trenti, M., & Treu, T., 2015, ApJ, 813, 21Google Scholar
Merlin, E., Amorín, R., Castellano, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 590, A30Google Scholar
Ota, K., Iye, M., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planck Collaboration, Adam, R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A108Google Scholar
Salvaterra, R., Ferrara, A., & Dayal, P., 2011, MNRAS, 414, 847Google Scholar
Yue, B., Ferrara, A., Vanzella, E., & Salvaterra, R., 2014, MNRAS, 443, L20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yue, B., Ferrara, A., & Xu, Y., 2016, MNRAS, 463, 1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yue, B., Castellano, M., Ferrara, A., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1711.05130Google Scholar