Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:27:16.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Galaxy Growth at Early Times from 3D Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

N. M. Förster Schreiber  and
the SINS/zC-SINF & KMOS3D teams
N. M. Förster Schreiber
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany email: forster@mpe.mpg.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Spatially- and spectrally-resolved studies have proven very powerful in exploring the processes driving baryonic mass assembly and star formation at redshifts z ∼ 1–3, the heyday of massive galaxy formation. This contribution presents selected key results from near-infrared integral field spectroscopic studies of z ∼ 1–3 galaxies, including from the SINS/zC-SINF and KMOS3D surveys with SINFONI and KMOS at the ESO Very Large Telescope, highlights synergies with observations at other wavelengths, and discusses some of the implications for early galaxy evolution from mass assembly to feedback processes.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Issue S309: Galaxies in 3D across the Universe , July 2014 , pp. 232 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Bournaud, F., Elmegreen, B. G., & Elmegreen, D. M. 2007, ApJ, 670, 237Google Scholar
Bournaud, F., Perret, V., Renaud, F., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 57Google Scholar
Brusa, M., Bongiorno, A., Cresci, G., et al. 2014, MNRAS, in press (arXiv:1409.1615)Google Scholar
Cano-Díaz, M., Maiolino, R., Marconi, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, L8Google Scholar
Ceverino, D., Dekel, A., Mandelker, N., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 3490Google Scholar
Contini, T., Garilli, B., Le Fèvre, O., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A91Google Scholar
Cresci, G., Hicks, E. K. S., Genzel, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 115Google Scholar
Dekel, A., Sari, R., & Ceverino, D. 2009, ApJ, 703, 785Google Scholar
Dekel, A. & Burkert, A. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbaz, D., Daddi, E., Le Borgne, D., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 33Google Scholar
Épinat, B., Contini, T., Le Fèvre, O., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 789Google Scholar
Épinat, B., Tasca, L., Amram, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A92Google Scholar
Förster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., Lehnert, M. D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 1062Google Scholar
Förster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., Bouché, N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster Schreiber, N. M., Shapley, A. E., Erb, D. K., et al. 2011a, ApJ, 731, 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster Schreiber, N. M., Shapley, A. E., Genzel, R., et al. 2011b, ApJ, 739, 45Google Scholar
Förster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., Newman, S. F., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, 38Google Scholar
Genel, S., Naab, T., Genzel, R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 745, 11Google Scholar
Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., Eisenhauer, F., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genzel, R., Burkert, A., Bouché, N., et al. 2008, ApJ, 687, 59Google Scholar
Genzel, R., Newman, S. F., Jones, T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 101Google Scholar
Genzel, R., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Lang, P., et al. 2014a, ApJ, 785, 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genzel, R., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Rosario, D., et al. 2014b, ApJ, in press (arXiv:1406.0183)Google Scholar
Glazebrook, K., 2013, Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia, 30, 56Google Scholar
Gnerucci, A., Marconi, A., Cresci, G., et al. 2011a, A&A, 528, A88Google Scholar
Gnerucci, A., Marconi, A., Cresci, G., et al. 2011b, A&A, 533, A124Google Scholar
Harrison, C. M., Alexander, D. M., Swinbank, A. M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1073Google Scholar
Jones, T. A., Ellis, R. S., Jullo, E., & Richard, J. 2010a, ApJ, 725, L176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. A., Swinbank, A. M., Ellis, R. S., Richard, J., & Stark, D. P. 2010b, MNRAS, 404, 1247Google Scholar
Jones, T. A., Ellis, R. S., Richard, J., & Jullo, E. 2013, ApJ, 765, 48Google Scholar
Lang, P., Wuyts, S., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 11Google Scholar
Law, D. R., Steidel, C. C., Erb, D. K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 2057Google Scholar
Law, D. R., Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., et al. 2012, Nature, 487, 338Google Scholar
Lilly, S. J., Carollo, C. M., Pipino, A., Renzini, A., & Peng, Y. 2013, ApJ, 772, 119Google Scholar
Mancini, C., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Renzini, A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 86Google Scholar
Martig, M., Bournaud, F., Teyssier, R., & Dekel, A. 2009, ApJ, 707, 250Google Scholar
Nesvadba, N. P. H., Polletta, M., Lehnert, M. D., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2359Google Scholar
Newman, S. F., Shapiro Griffin, K., Genzel, R., et al. 2012a, ApJ, 752, 111Google Scholar
Newman, S. F., Genzel, R., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2012b, ApJ, 761, 43Google Scholar
Newman, S. F., Genzel, R., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 104Google Scholar
Peng, Y., Lilly, S. J., Kovac, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 193Google Scholar
Rodighiero, G., Daddi, E., Baronchelli, I., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, L40Google Scholar
Shapiro, K. L., Genzel, R., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., & Adelberger, K. L. 2003, ApJ, 588, 65Google Scholar
Sharples, R., Bender, R., Agudo Berbel, A., et al. 2013, The Messenger, 151, 21Google Scholar
Sobral, D., Swinbank, A. M., Stott, J. P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 139Google Scholar
Stark, D. P., Swinbank, A. M., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2008, Nature, 455, 775Google Scholar
Stott, J. P., Sobral, D., Swinbank, A. M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2695Google Scholar
Swinbank, A. M., Smail, I., Sobral, D., et al. 2012a, ApJ, 760, 130Google Scholar
Swinbank, A. M., Sobral, D., Smail, I., et al. 2012b, MNRAS, 426, 935Google Scholar
Tacchella, S., Lang, P., Carollo, C. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
Tacconi, L. J., Neri, R., Genzel, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 74Google Scholar
Weiner, B. J., Coil, A. L., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2009, ApJ, 692, 187Google Scholar
Whitaker, K. E., van Dokkum, P. G., Brammer, G., & Franx, M. 2012, ApJ, 754, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisnioski, E., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Wuyts, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, submitted (arXiv:1409.6791)Google Scholar
Wisnioski, E., Glazebrook, K., Blake, C., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2601Google Scholar
Wisnioski, E., Glazebrook, K., Blake, C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 3339Google Scholar
Wright, S. A., Larkin, J. E., Law, D. R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 421Google Scholar
Wuyts, S., Förster Schreiber, N. M., van der Wel, A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 742, 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuyts, S., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuyts, S., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Nelson, E. J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuyts, E., Rigby, J. R., Gladders, M. D., & Sharon, K. 2014a, ApJ, 781, 61Google Scholar
Wuyts, E., Kurk, J., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2014b, ApJ, 789, L40Google Scholar
Yuan, T.-T., Kewley, L. J., Swinbank, A. M., Richard, J., & Livermore, R. C. 2011, ApJ, 732, L14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, T.-T., Kewley, L. J., Swinbank, A. M., & Richard, J. 2012, ApJ, 759, 66Google Scholar