Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:00:35.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IAU Commission 25, and the development of early photometric systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2019

Christiaan Sterken
Christiaan Sterken*
Affiliation:
University of Brussels (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium email: csterken@vub.ac.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The International Astronomical Union was conceived in 1918, and was formed one year later in Brussels. One of the 32 initial Commissions was the Committee on Stellar Photometry that later on became IAU Commission 25 Astronomical Photometry and Polarimetry, and since 2015 Commission B6 with the same name. The initial functions to be exercised by the Committee were

  1. (a) to advise in the matter of notation, nomenclature, definitions, conventions, etc., and

  2. (b) to plan and execute investigations requiring the cooperation of several observers or institutions.

The basic philosophy was that IAU Commission 25 was to be an advisory body, rather than a decision-making committee that imposes its regulations. This position was reconfirmed at the 10th IAU General Assembly in 1958.

From the early days on, the Commission members engaged in the teaching of the principles of photometric measurement – either via the Commission meetings and the ensuing reports, or via external means, such as lectures and publications. The topics of instruction dealt with absorption of light in the atmosphere, the modification imposed by the character of the receiving apparatus, the unequal response of different receivers to a same stimulus, and variations in the data-recorder response from one experiment to another.

From the 1930s on it was suggested that IAU Commission 25 takes responsibility in matters of standard stars, standard filters and standard calibration methods.

During the first half-century since its foundation, Commission 25 was an active forum for discussions on the basic principles of astronomical photometry, including the associated problems of transformability of magnitudes and colour indices from one instrumental configuration to another. During the second half-century of its existence, the Commission has served as a sort of news agency reporting on the developments in detector engineering, filter technology and data reduction. All along the Commission members were committed to accuracy and precision, a struggle that was primarily driven by the jumps forward in performance and sensitivity of every new detector that was introduced.

The development over one century shows that the Commission was continuously touching on the philosophy of precise measurement, where accurate measuring – for a select group of pioneers – was an end in itself.

This presentation looks back on the opinions of key players in the photometric standardisation debate, and briefly presents two case studies that illustrate the illusionary accuracy reached over a century in determining, as Commission member Ralph Allan Sampson put it, “a detail like magnitude”.

Keywords

techniques: photometricinstrumentation: detectorshistory and philosophy of astronomystandardsIAU Commission 25IAU Commission B6
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S349: Under One Sky: The IAU Centenary Symposium , December 2018 , pp. 357 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Batten, A. H. 1985, The choice of standard stars, In Calibration of Fundamental Stellar Quantities, 3–16. eds. Hayes, D.S., Pasinetti, L.E., and Davis Philip, A.G., (Dordrecht: Reidel)10.1007/978-94-009-5456-4_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, J. 1992, Trans IAU 21B, 242Google Scholar
Bigourdan, G. 1901, Le système métrique des poids et des mesures, (Paris: Gauthier-Villars)Google Scholar
Butler, C. J. and Elliott, I. (eds.) 1993, Stellar Photometry– Current Techniques and Future Developments, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Campbell, W. W. and Stebbins, J. 1920, Report on the Organisation of the International Astronomical Union, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Volume 6, Issue 6, 349Google Scholar
Difley, J. A. 1968, Two Photographic Developers for Astronomical Use, AJ, 73, 762Google Scholar
Fabry, Ch. (1933) La photométrie astronomique et celle des physiciens, in Annuaire du Bureau des Longitudes, p. B2, (Paris: Gauthier-Villars et Cie)Google Scholar
Fermilab 2012, Calibration and Standardization of Large Surveys and Missions in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16–19 April 2012, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/4958/Google Scholar
Fowler, A. 1922, Trans IAU, 1, 69Google Scholar
Fowler, A. 1925, Trans IAU, 2, 86Google Scholar
Hall, D. S. 2005, in Light Curves of Variable Stars, ed. Sterken, C. and Jaschek, C., pp. 117–121. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, J. B. 1996, The Measurement of Starlight: Two Centuries of Astronomical Photometry, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Henize, K. G. 1956, Catalogues of Halpha-emission Stars and Nebulae in the Magellanic Clouds, ApJS, 2, 315Google Scholar
Herschel, J. F. W. 1847, Results of astronomical observations made during the years 1834, 5, 6, 7, 8, at the Cape of Good Hope; being the completion of a telescopic survey of the whole surface of the visible heavens, commenced in 1825, (London: Smith, Elder and co)10.5479/sil.422148.39088007119118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hippke, M., Kroll, P., Matthai, F., et al. 2017, Sonneberg Plate Photometry for Boyajian’s Star in Two Passbands, ApJ, 837, 85Google Scholar
IAU FM12 2018, Calibration and Standardization Issues in UV-VIS-IR Astronomy, Focus Meeting 12 organized at the XXXth General Assembly in ViennaGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. L. and Morgan, W. W. 1953, Fundamental stellar photometry for standards of spectral type on the revised system of the Yerkes spectral atlas, ApJ, 117, 313Google Scholar
Kaufer, A. and Kerber, F. (eds.) 2008, The 2007 ESO Instrument Calibration Workshop, ESO Astrophysics Symposia, Springer 10.1007/978-3-540-76963-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, I. 1952, Effective extinction values in wide-band photometry, AJ 57, 253Google Scholar
Lattis, J. M. 2014, The Stebbins Galaxy: the origins of interstellar medium studies in the shrinking super-galaxy, JAHH, 17, 240Google Scholar
Lattis, J. M. 2018, Personal communication (email August 22)Google Scholar
Lattis, J. M. and Lattis, A. J. 2019, American Astronomers in Belgium, 1919: Snapshots from the Founding of the IAU, these ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
Laycock, S., et al. 2010, Digital Access to a Sky Century at Harvard: Initial Photometry and Astrometry, AJ, 140, 1062Google Scholar
Leavitt, H. S. 1917, The North Polar Sequence, Annals of the Astronomical Observatory of Harvard College 71, no. 3, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Longair, M. 2019, 100 Years of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology. A celebration of the centenary of the IAU, these ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
Maslow, A. H. 1966, The Psychology of Science, p. 15. (London: Harper & Row)Google Scholar
Milone, E. F. and Sterken, C. 2011, Astronomical Photometry: Past, Present, and Future, Springer Astrophysics and Space Science Library seriesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munari, U., Fiorucci, M. and Moro, D. 2002, Asiago Database on Photometric Systems, http://ulisse.pd.astro.it/Astro/ADPS/, last accessed September 1, 2018Google Scholar
Oort, J. H. 1950, Trans IAU 7, 271Google Scholar
Oosterhoff, P. Th. 1954, Trans IAU 8, 363 and 367Google Scholar
Pecker, J.-C. 1964, Trans IAU 12, 265Google Scholar
Pel, J. W. and Lub, J. 2007, The Walraven VBLUW Photometric System: 32 Years of 5-Channel Photometry, in The Future of Photometric, Spectrophotometric and Polarimetric Standardization, ed. Sterken, C., San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 364, p. 63Google Scholar
Pogson, N. 1857, Magnitudes of Thirty-six of the Minor Planets for the first day of each month of the year 1857, MNRAS 17, 12Google Scholar
Redman, R. O. 1952, in Oosterhoff (1954, ed.), Trans IAU 8, 364Google Scholar
Sadler, D. H. 1960, Trans IAU 10, 370Google Scholar
Sampson, R. A. 1921, The Measurement of Starlight, The Observatory, 44, 298Google Scholar
Schaefer, B. E. 2016 KIC 8462852 Faded at an Average Rate of 0.164±0.013 Magnitudes per Century from 1890 to 1989, ApJL, 822, 34Google Scholar
Seares, F. H., Bailey, S. I., Jordan, F. C., Parkhurst, J. A. and Stebbins, J. 1920, Report of the Committee on Stellar Photometry, in Campbell and Stebbins (1920), p. 381Google Scholar
Seares, F. H., Ross, F. E., Joyner, M. C. 1941, Magnitudes and colours of stars north of +80 deg, Mount Wilson Papers, 6Google Scholar
Shapley, H. and Ames, A. 1929, The Coma-Virgo Galaxies, I On the Transparency of Intergalactie Space, Harvard College Observatory Bulletin No. 864Google Scholar
Shore, S. N. 1992, The Luminous Blue Variables in the Ultraviolet, in Nonisotropic and Variable Outflows from Stars, ASP Conf. Series, eds. Drissen, L., Leitherer, C. and Nota, A., Vol. 22, p. 342Google Scholar
Stebbins, J. 1910, The measurement of the light of stars with a selenium photometer, with an application to the variations of Algol, Apj, 32, 185Google Scholar
Stebbins, J. and Whitford, A. J. 1945, Six-colour photometry of stars. III. The colours of 238 stars of different spectral types, ApJ, 102, 318Google Scholar
Stebbins, J., Whitford, A. E. and Johnson, H. L. 1950, Photoelectric Magnitudes and Colours of Stars in Selected Areas 57, 61, and 68, ApJ, 112, 469Google Scholar
Sterken, C. 1992a, On the future of existing photometric systems, Vistas in Astronomy, 35, 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterken, C. 1992b, On the impact of an ultimate metrological reform in astronomical photometry, Vistas in Astronomy, 35, 263Google Scholar
Sterken, C. (ed.) 2007, The Future of Photometric, Spectrophotometric and Polarimetric Standardization, San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 364Google Scholar
Sterken, C. 2010, Writing a Scientific Paper II. Communication by Graphics, in Scientific Writing for Young Astronomers, (Paris: EDP Sciences)Google Scholar
Sterken, C. 2019, in Southern Horizons in Time-Domain Astronomy, Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 339, Griffin, E. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press p. 25Google Scholar
Sterken, C. and Manfroid, J. 1992, Astronomical Photometry, A Guide, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 175, (Dordrecht: Kluwer)10.1007/978-94-011-2476-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterken, C., Milone, E. F., Young, A. T. 2011, Photometric Precision and Accuracy, in Astronomical Photometry: Past, Present, and Future, Milone, E. F., and Sterken, C. (eds.). Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 373, Berlin: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sūdžius, J., Straižys, V. and Davis Philip, A. G. 2004, Stellar Photometry: Past, Present, and Future, (Vilnius: Vilnius University)Google Scholar
Susalla, P. and Lattis, J. 2010, Wisconsin at the Frontiers of Astronomy: A History of Innovation and Exploration, State of Wisconsin Blue Book 2009–2010, 100–187, (Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison)Google Scholar
Toomer, G. J. 1984, Ptolemy’s Almagest, (New York: Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
Weaver, H. F. 1946, The development of astronomical photometry, Popular Astronomy, 54, 211/287/339/389/451/504Google Scholar
Young, A. T. 1974, in Methods of Experimental Physics, Vol 12, Astrophysics. Part A: Optical and Infrared, Carleton, N. (ed.), (New York: Academic Press)Google Scholar
Young, A. T. 1990, Astronomical computing: how we perceive star brightnesses, Sky and Telescope, 79, 311Google Scholar
Young, A. T. 1992, Improvements in photometry. V – High-order moments in transformation theory, A&A, 257, 366Google Scholar
Young, A. T. 1994, in The Impact of Long-term Monitoring on Variable Star Research: Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Data Handling, Archiving, eds. Sterken, C. and de Groot, M., NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, (Dordrecht: Kluwer)Google Scholar