Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:15:24.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The IAU, from Commissions to Divisions… to Commissions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2019

Thierry Montmerle
Thierry Montmerle*
Affiliation:
Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, France Past IAU General Secretary, 2012–2015 email: montmerle@iap.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper tells the story behind the succession of reforms that, for the last twenty years, progressively brought the IAU in line with the fast developments of astronomy and the public awareness of the sky worldwide. One major difficulty was how to organize the scientific activities of an exponentially growing population of astronomers, from 200 at its creation in 1919, in the aftermath of WW I, to over 13 500 a century later. The first attempts at “restructuring the IAU”, as the expression went, can be dated back to the 1988–1991 triennium. As shown by the Minutes of the successive meetings of the Executive Committee, the attempted strategy was to encourage and even propose Commission mergers, but this policy met with strong opposition, even though a need for change was felt increasingly necessary. The new approach proposed by L. Woltjer, then incoming IAU President, during the 1994 General Assembly at The Hague, was to retain the existing Commissions (along with their Working Groups) but grouping them, more or less topically, into a dozen Divisions. Putting an end to the Commission merger deadlock, this new structure was adopted very quickly, and confirmed at the following GA in Kyoto (1997). But even after this restructuring, there was little evolution of the Commissions, and in some areas the scientific classification and breakdown of the IAU activities reflected by Divisions became questionable. As a result, a new reform was undertaken in 2009, based on a more global approach, but keeping the Division/Commission/Working Group three-tier structure as the backbone of the reforming efforts. Thanks to a close collaboration between the Executive Committee and the Division Presidents, the Divisions were first redefined and approved at the Beijing GA in 2012, followed by a historic, full-fledged “Commission reset”, itself approved at the Honolulu GA in 2015. This marked the end of a structure created almost a century before, at the foundation of the IAU: the Standing Committees, precursors to the Commissions. But in response to a Call for Proposals issued by the Executive Committee, the “reset” gave birth to a whole new Commission structure, conceived by the community itself.

Keywords

Standing CommitteesCommissionsDivisionsWorking Groups; National Membersindividual members; Executive Committee
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S349: Under One Sky: The IAU Centenary Symposium , December 2018 , pp. 289 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Abbott, B. P., Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, 2016, Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 061102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, W. S. 1949, The History of the International Astronomical Union, Pub. Astr. Soc. Pacific, 61 (N°358), 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaauw, A. 1994, History of the IAU: The Birth and First Half-Century of the International Astronomical Union (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 296 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cock, A. G. 1983, Chauvinism and Internationalism in Science: The International Research Council, 1919–1926, Roy. Soc.J. Hist. Sci., 37, 249Google ScholarPubMed
Daston, L. 2017, in Science in the Archives (Daston, L., Ed., U. Chicago Press), p. 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, A. S. 1919, The Total Eclipse of 1919 May 29 and the Influence of Gravitation on Light, The Observatory, 42, 119Google Scholar
Einstein, A. 1916, Sitzungsber, K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.: Phys. Math. Kl. 1916 (part 1), 688; Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Annalen der Physik, vol. 354 (N°7), 769–822Google Scholar
Isaacson, W. 2007, Einstein, His Life and Universe (New York: Simon & Schuster), 680 pp.Google Scholar
Lamy, J. (Ed.) 2006, La Carte du Ciel (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France), 250 pp.Google Scholar
Montmerle, T. (Ed.) 2015, Reports on Astronomy: Commission Legacy Reports, Transactions of the IAU, Volume 29A (Cambridge University Press), 549 pp.Google Scholar
Montmerle, T. (Ed.) 2016, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth General Assembly, Beijing 2012, Transactions of the IAU, Volume 28B (Cambridge University Press), 409 pp.Google Scholar
Ruggles, C. (Ed.) 2017, Heritage Sites of Astronomy and Archaeoastronomy in the context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: Thematic Study No. 2 (Paris: ICOMOS/IAU; Ocarina Books Ltd, Bognor Regis, West Sussex, UK), 313 pp.Google Scholar