Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:18:13.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of the Schwabe/Hale solar cycles on climate change during the Maunder Minimum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Hiroko Miyahara ,
Yusuke Yokoyama  and
Yasuhiko T. Yamaguchi
Hiroko Miyahara
Affiliation:
Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8582, Japan email: hmiya@icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Yusuke Yokoyama
Affiliation:
Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 1-15-1 Minamidai, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-8639, Japan Department of Earth & Planetary Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan Institute of Biogeoscience, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2-15, Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Yasuhiko T. Yamaguchi
Affiliation:
Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 1-15-1 Minamidai, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-8639, Japan Department of Earth & Planetary Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan Institute of Biogeoscience, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2-15, Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have examined the variation of carbon-14 content in annual tree rings, and investigated the transitions of the characteristics of the Schwabe/Hale (11-year/22-year) solar and cosmic-ray cycles during the last 1200 years, focusing mainly on the Maunder and Spoerer minima and the early Medieval Maximum Period. It has been revealed that the mean length of the Schwabe/Hale cycles changes associated with the centennial-scale variation of solar activity level. The mean length of Schwabe cycle had been ~14 years during the Maunder Minimum, while it was ~9 years during the early Medieval Maximum Period. We have also found that climate proxy record shows cyclic variations similar to stretching/shortening Schwabe/Hale solar cycles in time, suggesting that both Schwabe and Hale solar cycles are playing important role in climate change. In this paper, we review the nature of Schwabe and Hale cycles of solar activity and cosmic-ray flux during the Maunder Minimum and their possible influence on climate change. We suggest that the Hale cycle of cosmic rays are amplified during the grand solar minima and thus the influence of cosmic rays on climate change is prominently recognizable during such periods.

Keywords

Sun: activitysolar-terrestrial relationsISM: cosmic rays
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S264: Solar and Stellar Variability: Impact on Earth and Planets , August 2009 , pp. 427 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Berggren, A.-M., Beer, J., Possnert, G., Aldahan, A., Kubik, P., Christl, M., Johnsen, S. J., Abreu, J., & Vinther, B. M. 2009 Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L11801Google Scholar
Friis-Christensen, E. F. & Svensmark, H. 1997 Adv. Space Res., 20, 913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
High, J. D. 1996 Science, 272, 981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, D. V. & Schatten, K. H. 1998 Sol. Phys., 181, 491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokipii, J. R. 1991, in: Sonnet, C.P., Giampapa, M.S. & Matthers, M.S. (eds.), The Sun in Time, (The University of Arizona Press, USA)Google Scholar
Kodera, K. & Kuroda, Y. 2005 J. Geophys. Res., 110, D02111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kota, J. & Jokipii, J. R. 2001 Adv. Space Res., 27, 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lean, J. L., Beer, B., & Bradley, R. 1995 Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyahara, H., Masuda, K., Muraki, Y., Furuzawa, H., Menjo, H., & Nakamura, T. 2004 Sol. Phys., 224, 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyahara, H., Masuda, K., Muraki, Y., Kitagawa, H., & Nakamura, T. 2006 J. Geophys. Res., 111, A03103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyahara, H., Masuda, K., Nagaya, K., Kuwana, K., Muraki, Y., & Nakamura, T. 2007 Adv. Space Res., 40, 2060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyahara, H., Yokoyama, Y., & Masuda, K. 2008 Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 272, 290Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P., & Braziunas, T.F. 1998 Radiocarbon, 40, 1127Google Scholar
Svensmark, H. 2007 Astron. Geophys., 48, 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, B. A. 1996 J. Geophys. Res., 101, 29701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, I. G., Mursula, K., & Kovaltsov, G.A. 2001 A&A, 101, 29701Google Scholar
Vinther, B. M., Johnsen, S. J., Andersen, K. K., Clausen, H. B., & Hansen, A. W. 2003 Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, doi:10.1029/2002GL016193Google Scholar