Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T10:07:40.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The IPoP method to measure Cepheid distances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

J. Breitfelder
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile email: jbreitfe@eso.org LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS UMR 8109, UPMC, Université Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France
A. Mérand
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile email: jbreitfe@eso.org
P. Kervella
Affiliation:
LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS UMR 8109, UPMC, Université Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France
A. Gallenne
Affiliation:
Universidad de Concepción, Departamento de Astronomía, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cepheids are one of the most famous standard candles used to calibrate the Galactic distance scale. However, it is fundamental to develop and test independent tools to measure their distances, in order to reach a better calibration of their period-luminosity (P-L) relationship. We present here the first results obtained with the Integrated Parallax of Pulsation (IPoP) method, an extension of the classical Baade-Wesselink method that derives the distance by making a global modelisation of all the available data. With this method we aim to reach a 2% accuracy on distance measurements.

Cepheid masses are also an essential key for our comprehension of those objects. We briefly present an original approach to derive observational constraint on Cepheid masses. Unfortunately, it does not lead to promising results.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Fredrick, L. W., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 1695Google Scholar
Bono, G., Gieren, W. P., Marconi, M., & Fouqué, P., Caputo, F. 2011, ApJ, 563, 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacour, S., Thiébaut, E., & Perrin, G. 2009, ApJ, 707, 632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérand, A., Kervella, P., Coudé du Foresto, V., et al. 2005, A&A, 438, L9Google Scholar