Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:40:19.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Massive-Star Feedback at Low Metallicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2024

M. S. Oey Open the ORCID record for M. S. Oey [Opens in a new window] ,
M. C. Jecmen ,
A. N. Sawant ,
A. E. Jaskot Open the ORCID record for A. E. Jaskot [Opens in a new window] ,
A. Danehkar ,
L. J. Smith  and
J. Melinder
M. S. Oey*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Department of Astronomy, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
M. C. Jecmen
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Department of Astronomy, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
A. N. Sawant
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Department of Astronomy, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA Current address: EPFL, Institute of Mathematics, MA C2 647, Station 8, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
A. E. Jaskot
Affiliation:
Williams College, Department of Astronomy, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA
A. Danehkar
Affiliation:
Current address: Eureka Scientific, 2452 Delmer St., Suite 100, Oakland, CA 94602, USA
L. J. Smith
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
J. Melinder
Affiliation:
Stockholm University, Department of Astronomy, Oscar Klein Centre, AlbaNova University Centre, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
*
email: msoey@umich.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Early cosmic epochs are characterized by low metallicity and high specific star-formation rates. These conditions are dominated by massive-star feedback that may be dramatically different than the traditional model dominated by hot, thermal superwinds driven by supernova explosions. Instead, metal-poor feedback from massive stars may be radiation-dominated, with weak mechanical feedback, possibly aiding the escape of Lyα and Lyman continuum radiation. I will describe our understanding that is emerging from observations of starburst galaxies in the local universe.

Keywords

massive starsgalactic windssuperbubblesyoung massive clusterscore-collapse supernovaestarburst galaxiesemission-line galaxiesgalaxy evolutionreionization
Type
Contributed Paper
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 18 , Symposium S377: Early Disk-Galaxy Formation from JWST to the Milky Way , December 2022 , pp. 14 - 21
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Amorín, R., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0057 Google Scholar
Berg, D. A., Erb, D. K., Auger, M. W., Pettini, M., & Brammer, G. B. 2018, ApJ, 859, 164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. G. A., Hartmann, D., & Burton, W. B. 1995, A&A, 300, 903 Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A., & Clegg, A. W. 1985, Nature, 317, 44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. L., Guerrero, M. A., Chu, Y.-H., Chen, C. H. R., & Dunne, B. C. 2004, ApJ, 605, 751 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danehkar, A., Oey, M. S., & Gray, W. J. 2021, ApJ, 921, 91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danehkar, A., Oey, M. S., & Gray, W. J. 2022, ApJ, 937, 68 Google Scholar
Dopita, M. A., Groves, B. A., Sutherland, R. S., Binette, L., & Cecil, G. 2002, ApJ, 572, 753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, J. B., Shull, J. M., & Ferrara, A. 2000, ApJ, 531, 846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drissen, L., Roy, J.-L., Robert, C., & Devost, D. 2000, AJ, 119, 688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekström, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A146 Google Scholar
Flury, S. R., et al. 2022, ApJS, 260, 1 Google Scholar
Freyer, T., Hensler, G., & Yorke, H. W. 2003, ApJ, 594, 888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgy, C., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliani, J. L., J. 1979, ApJ, 233, 280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, W. J., Oey, M. S., Silich, S., & Scannapieco, E. 2019, ApJ, 887, 161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, T. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., Langer, N., & Hartmann, D. H. 2003, ApJ, 591, 288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izotov, Worseck, Schaerer, Guseva, Thuan, Fricke, Verhamme, Orlitov Izotov, Y. I., Worseck, G., Schaerer, D., Guseva, N. G., Thuan, T. X., Fricke, Verhamme, A., & Orlitová, I. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4851Google Scholar
James, B. L., Auger, M., Aloisi, A., Calzetti, D., & Kewley, L. 2016, ApJ, 816, 40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaskot, A. E., Dowd, T., Oey, M. S., Scarlata, C., & McKinney, J. 2019, ApJ, 885, 96 Google Scholar
Jaskot, A. E., Oey, M. S., Scarlata, C., & Dowd, T. 2017, ApJL, 851, L9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justham, S., & Schawinski, K. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 1641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komarova, L., Oey, M. S., Krumholz, M. R., Silich, S., Kumari, N., & James, B. L. 2021, ApJL, 920, L46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, M., Charbonnel, C., Decressin, T., Meynet, G., Prantzos, N., & Diehl, R. 2012, A&A, 546, L5 Google Scholar
Krumholz, M. R., & Matzner, C. D. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumholz, M. R., & Thompson, T. A. 2012, ApJ, 760, 155 Google Scholar
Leitherer, C., Ekström, S., Meynet, G., Schaerer, D., Agienko, K. B., & Levesque, E. M. 2014, ApJS, 212, 14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Low, M.-M., & McCray, R. 1988, ApJ, 324, 776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiolino, R. 2023, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Micheva, G., Oey, M. S., Jaskot, A. E., & James, B. L. 2017, ApJ, 845, 165 Google Scholar
O’Connor, E., & Ott, C. D. 2011, ApJ, 730, 70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oey, M. S. 1996, ApJ, 467, 666 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oey, M. S., & Garca-Segura, G. 2004, ApJ, 613, 302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oey, M. S., Herrera, C. N., Silich, S., Reiter, M., James, B. L., Jaskot, A. E., & Micheva, G. 2017, ApJL, 849, L1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oey, M. S., Smith, R. K., Snowden, S. L., & Kuntz, K. D. 2009, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1156 (AIP), 295–304 Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, S. A., Podsiadlowski, P., & Pfahl, E. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Thorsen, T. E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 14 Google Scholar
Saken, J. M., Fesen, R. A., & Shull, J. M. 1992, ApJS, 81, 715 Google Scholar
Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161 Google Scholar
Semenov, V. A., Kravtsov, A. V., & Gnedin, N. Y. 2021, ApJ, 918, 13 Google Scholar
Silich, S., & Tenorio-Tagle, G. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silich, S., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Muñoz-Tuñón, C. 2007, ApJ, 669, 952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silich, S., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Rodríguez-González, A. 2004, ApJ, 610, 226 Google Scholar
Smith, D. A., & Wang, Q. D. 2004, ApJ, 611, 881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. J., Westmoquette, M. S., Gallagher, J. S., O’Connell, R. W., Rosario, D. J., & de Grijs, R. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. J., Oey, M. S., Hernandez, S. et al. 2023, arXiv231003413SGoogle Scholar
Stark, D. P., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 1393 Google Scholar
Sukhbold, T., Ertl, T., Woosley, S. E., Brown, J. M., & Janka, H. T. 2016, ApJ, 821, 38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenorio-Tagle, G., Wünsch, R., Silich, S., & Palouš, J. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thuan, T. X., Bauer, F. E., & Izotov, Y. I. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 1841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. L., Beck, S. C., Crosthwaite, L. P., Larkin, J. E., McLean, I. S., & Meier, D. S. 2003, Nature, 423, 621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, J. S., Muijres, L. E., Anthonisse, B., de Koter, A., Gräfener, G., & Langer, N. 2011, A&A, 531, A132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vishniac, E. T. 1983, ApJ, 274, 152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R. 1977, ApJ, 218, 377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wünsch, R., Tenorio-Tagle, G., Palouš, J., & Silich, S. 2008, ApJ, 683, 683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zastrow, J., Oey, M. S., Veilleux, S., & McDonald, M. 2013, ApJ, 779, 76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2008, ApJ, 679, 639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar