Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:40:25.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A mid-infrared exploration of the dusty environments of active galactic nuclei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2014

Almudena Alonso-Herrero*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física de Cantabria, CSIC-UC, 39005 Santander, Spain email: aalonso@ifca.unican.es Augusto G. Linares Senior Research Fellow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the first results from a mid-infrared survey of local Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) using the CanariCam (CC) instrument on the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC). We are obtaining sub-arcsecond angular resolution (0.3 − 0.6 arcsec) mid-IR imaging and spectroscopic observations of a sample of 100 local AGN, which are complemented with data taken with T-ReCS, VISIR, and Michelle. The full sample contains approximately 140 AGN, covers nearly six orders of magnitude in AGN luminosity, and includes low-luminosity AGN (LLAGN), Seyfert 1s and 2s, QSO, radio galaxies, and (U)LIRGs. The main goals of this project are: (1) to test whether the properties of the dusty tori of the AGN Unified Model depend on the AGN type, (2) to study the nuclear star formation activity and obscuration of local AGN, and (3) to explore the role of the dusty torus in LLAGN.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Alonso-Herrero, A.et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 82Google Scholar
Alonso-Herrero, A.et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, L14Google Scholar
Antonucci, R. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 473Google Scholar
Asensio Ramos, A. & Ramos Almeida, C. 2009, ApJ, 696, 2075Google Scholar
Diamond-Stanic, A. M. & Rieke, G. H. 2010, ApJ, 724, 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond-Stanic, A. M. & Rieke, G. H. 2012, ApJ, 746, 168Google Scholar
Elitzur, M. & Shlosman, I. 2006, ApJ, 648, L101Google Scholar
Esquej, P.et al. 2013, ApJ, in press (arXiv:1311.0703)Google Scholar
González-Martín, O.et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A35Google Scholar
Goulding, A. D.et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 5Google Scholar
Ho, L. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 475Google Scholar
Hopkins, P. F. & Quataert, E. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1529Google Scholar
Levenson, N. A.et al. 2007, ApJ, 645, L45Google Scholar
Maiolino, R. & Rieke, G. H. 1995, ApJ, 454, 95Google Scholar
Mason, R. E.et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R. E.et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 164Google Scholar
Nenkova, M.et al. 2008, ApJ, 685, 160Google Scholar
Packham, C.et al. 2005, ApJ, 618, L17Google Scholar
Packham, C.et al. 2007, ApJ, 661, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos Almeida, C.et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1127Google Scholar
Ramos Almeida, C.et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, 92Google Scholar
Roche, P. F.et al. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1689Google Scholar
Telesco, C. M.et al. 2003, SPIE, 4841, 913Google Scholar
Tristram, K. R. W.et al. 2009, A&A, 502, 67Google Scholar
Wada, K. & Norman, C. A. 2002, ApJ, 566, L21Google Scholar