Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:45:34.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models and nomenclature in Earth rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Nicole Capitaine
Nicole Capitaine*
Affiliation:
SYRTE, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, UPMC, 61 Av. de l'Observatoire, 75014, Paris, France email: n.capitaine@obspm.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The celestial Earth's orientation is required for many applications in fundamental astronomy and geodesy; it is currently determined with sub-milliarcsecond accuracy by astro-geodetic observations. Models for that orientation rely on solutions for the rotation of a rigid Earth model and on the geophysical representation of non-rigid Earth effects. Important IAU 2000/2006 resolutions on reference systems have been passed (and endorsed by the IUGG) that recommend a new paradigm and high accuracy models to be used in the transformation from terrestrial to celestial systems. This paper reviews the consequences of these resolutions on the adopted Earth orientation parameters, IAU precession-nutation models and associated nomenclature. It summarizes the fundamental aspects of the current IAU precession-nutation models and reports on the consideration of General Relativity (GR) in the solutions. This shows that the current definitions and nomenclature for Earth's rotation are compliant with GR and that the IAU precession-nutation is compliant with the IAU 2000 definition of the geocentric celestial reference system in the GR framework; however, the underlying Earth's rotation models basically are Newtonian.

Keywords

standardsastrometryephemeridesreference systemstimeEarth
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S261: Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy: Dynamics, Reference Frames, and Data Analysis , April 2009 , pp. 69 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bretagnon, P., Rocher, P., & Simon, J.-L., 1997, A&A 319, pp. 305Google Scholar
Brumberg, V. A., Bretagnon, P., & Francou, G., 1992, Proceedings of the Journées 1991 “Systèmes de référence spatio-temporels”, Capitaine, N. (ed), Observatoire de Paris, pp. 141–148Google Scholar
Brumberg, V. A. & Simon, J.-L., 2004, Proceedings of the Journées 2003 “Systèmes de référence spatio-temporels”, Finkelstein, A. & Capitaine, N. (eds), pp. 302–313Google Scholar
Capitaine, N., Guinot, B., & McCarthy, D. D., 2000, A&A 355, 398Google Scholar
Capitaine, N., Wallace, P. T., & Chapront, J., 2003, A&A 412, 567Google Scholar
Capitaine, N., Folgueira, M., & Souchay, J., 2005, A&A 445, 347Google Scholar
Capitaine, N. & Wallace, P. T., 2006, A&A 450, 855Google Scholar
Capitaine & IAU NFA WG, 2007, in Transactions of the IAU XXVIB, van derHucht, K. A. (ed), 14, pp. 474–475Google Scholar
Capitaine, N., Mathews, P. M., Dehant, V., Wallace, P. T., & Lambert, S. B., 2009, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 103, 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fienga, A., Manche, H., Laskar, J., & Gastineau, M., 2008, A&A 477, 315Google Scholar
Guinot, B., 1979, in Time and the Earth's Rotation, McCarthy, D. D. and Pilkington, J. D. (eds), D. Reidel Publishing Company, 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J., Capitaine, N., Chapront, J., et al. , 2006, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 94, 3, 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAU 2000, Transactions of the IAU XXIVB; Manchester, Rickman, H. (ed), Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Provo, USA, 2001, pp. 34–58Google Scholar
IAU 2006, Transactions of the IAU XXVIB; van der Hucht, K. A. (ed)Google Scholar
IAU 2006 NFA Glossary of the IAU Working Group on “Nomenclature for Fundamental Astronomy”, http://syrte.obspm.fr/iauWGnfa/NFAGlossary.htmlGoogle Scholar
IUGG 2007, IUGG Resolutions, http://www.iugg.org/resolutions/perugia07.pdfGoogle Scholar
IERS Conventions (2003), IERS Technical Note 32, McCarthy, D. D. and Petit, G. (eds), Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des desamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, 2004Google Scholar
Klioner, S., Gerlach, E., Soffel, M., 2009, this proceedings, 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, P. M., Herring, T. A., & Buffett, B. A., 2002, J. Geophys. Res. 107, B4, 10.1029/2001JB000390Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. D. & Luzum, B. J., 2003, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 85, 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasao, T., Okubo, S., & Saito, M., 1980, Proceedings of the IAU Symposium 78, Federov, E. P., Smith, M. L., Bender, P. L. (eds), Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1980, p. 165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soffel, M., Klioner, S. A., Petit et al. , 2003, AJ 126, 6, 2687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souchay, J., Loysel, B., Kinoshita, H., & Folgueira, M., 1999, A&AS 135, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, P. T., 1998, in Highlights of Astronomy Vol. 11A, Andersen, J. (ed), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 11, 191Google Scholar
Wallace, P. T. & Capitaine, N., 2006, A&A 459, 3, 981Google Scholar
Williams, J. G., 1994, AJ 108 (2), 711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, E. W., 1953, Astr. Pap. Amer. Ephem. Naut. Almanach XV, I, 1–165Google Scholar
Zerhouni, W., Capitaine, N., & Francou, G., 2009, Proceedings of the Journées 2008 “Systèmes de référence spatio-temporels”, Soffel, M. & Capitaine, N. (eds), pp. 186–189Google Scholar