Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:05:33.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nature of the solar dynamo at small scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

J. O. Stenflo*
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland Istituto Ricerche Solari Locarno, Via Patocchi, CH-6605 Locarno Monti, Switzerland email: stenflo@astro.phys.ethz.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is often claimed that there is not only one, but two different types of solar dynamos: the one that is responsible for the appearance of sunspots and the 11-yr cycle, frequently referred to as the “global dynamo”, and a statistically time-invariant dynamo, generally referred to as the “local dynamo”, which is supposed to be responsible for the ubiquitous magnetic structuring observed at small scales. Here we examine the relative contributions of these two qualitatively different dynamos to the small-scale magnetic flux, with the following conclusion: The local dynamo does not play a significant role at any of the spatially resolved scales, nearly all the small-scale flux, including the flux revealed by Hinode, is supplied by the global dynamo. This conclusion is reached by careful determination of the Sun's noise-corrected basal magnetic flux density while making use of a flux cancellation function determined from Hinode data. The only allowed range where there may be substantial or even dominating contributions from a local dynamo seems to be the scales below about 10 km, as suggested by observations of the Hanle depolarization effect in atomic spectral lines. To determine the fraction of the Hanle depolarization that may be due to the action of a local dynamo, a synoptic program is being initiated at IRSOL (Istituto Ricerche Solari Locarno).

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Cattaneo, F. 1999, ApJ (Letters), 515, L39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lites, B. W., Kubo, M., Socas-Navarro, H., et al. 2008, ApJ, 672, 1237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovay, K. & Szakaly, G. 1993, A&A, 274, 543 Google Scholar
Pietarila Graham, J., Danilovic, S., & Schüssler, M. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1728 Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. I., Fluri, D. M., Berdyugina, S. V., Bianda, M., & Ramelli, R. 2011, A&A, 529, A139 Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O. 1982, Solar Phys., 80, 209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenflo, J. O. 2003, in: Bueno, J. Trujillo & Sánchez Almeida, J. (eds.), Solar Polarization 3, Astron. Soc. Pacific Conf. Series, Vol. 307, 385Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O. 2010, A&A, 517, A37 Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O. 2011, A&A, 529, A42 Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O. 2012a, A&A, 541, A17 Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O. 2012b, A&A, 547, A93 Google Scholar
Trujillo Bueno, J., Shchukina, N. & Asensio Ramos, A. 2004, Nature, 430, 326 Google Scholar
Vögler, A. & Schüssler, M. 2007, A&A, 465, L43 Google Scholar