Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:22:48.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On magnetohydrodynamic turbulence and angular momentum transport in accretion disk boundary layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

Chi-kwan Chan
Affiliation:
NORDITA, Roslagstullsbacken 23, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden email: ckch@nordita.org
Martin E. Pessah
Affiliation:
Niels Bohr International Academy, Niels Bohr Institute Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark email: mpessah@nbi.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The physical modeling of the accretion disk boundary layer, the region where the disk meets the surface of the accreting star, usually relies on the assumption that angular momentum transport is opposite to the radial angular frequency gradient of the disk. The standard model for turbulent shear viscosity, widely adopted in astrophysics, satisfies this assumption by construction. However, this behavior is not supported by numerical simulations of turbulent magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) accretion disks, which show that angular momentum transport driven by the magnetorotational instability is inefficient in this inner disk region. I will discuss the results of a recent study on the generation of hydromagnetic stresses and energy density in the boundary layer around a weakly magnetized star. Our findings suggest that although magnetic energy density can be significantly amplified in this region, angular momentum transport is rather inefficient. This seems consistent with the results obtained in numerical simulations and suggests that the detailed structure of turbulent MHD boundary layers could differ appreciably from those derived within the standard framework of turbulent shear viscosity.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Armitage, P. J. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 895 Google Scholar
Armitage, P. J. 2010, Astrophysics of Planet FormationGoogle Scholar
Balbus, S. A. & Hawley, J. F. 1991, ApJ, 376, 214 Google Scholar
Balbus, S. A. & Hawley, J. F. 1998, Reviews of Modern Physics, 70, 1 Google Scholar
Balsara, D. S., Fisker, J. L., Godon, P., & Sion, E. M. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1536 Google Scholar
Frank, J., King, A., & Raine, D. J. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third EditionGoogle Scholar
Goodman, J. & Xu, G. 1994, ApJ, 432, 213 Google Scholar
Hartmann, L. 2009, Accretion Processes in Star Formation: Second Edition (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Hawley, J. F., Gammie, C. F., & Balbus, S. A. 1995, ApJ, 440, 742 Google Scholar
Inogamov, N. A. & Sunyaev, R. A. 2010, Astronomy Letters, 36, 848 Google Scholar
Pessah, M. E. & Chan, C.-K. 2012, ApJ, 751, 48 Google Scholar
Piro, A. L. & Bildsten, L. 2004, ApJ, 610, 977 Google Scholar
Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337 Google Scholar
Steinacker, A. & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2002, ApJ, 571, 413 Google Scholar