Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:28:18.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

One solar cycle of solar astrometry with MDI/SOHO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Marcelo Emilio ,
Jeff R. Kuhn  and
Rock I. Bush
Marcelo Emilio
Affiliation:
Observatório Astronômico-Departamento de Geociências Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil email: memilio@uepg.br
Jeff R. Kuhn
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Woodlawn Dr. 96822, HI, USA email: kuhn@ifa.hawaii.edu
Rock I. Bush
Affiliation:
Solar Physics Group, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA email: rbush@solar.stanford.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this work we describe the method and results of precise solar astrometry made with the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI), on board the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), during one complete solar cycle. We measured an upper limit to the solar radius variation, the absolute solar radius value and the solar shape. Our results are 22 mas peak-to-peak upper limit for the solar radius variation over the solar cycle, the absolute radius was measured as 959.28 ± 0.15 arcsec at 1 AU and the difference between polar and equatorial solar radii in 1997 was 5 km and about three times larger in 2001.

Keywords

Sun: fundamental parameters(Sun:) solar-terrestrial relationsSun: oscillationsSun: photosphere
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S264: Solar and Stellar Variability: Impact on Earth and Planets , August 2009 , pp. 21 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Brown, T. M. & Christensen-Dalsgarrd, J. 1998, ApJ, 500, L195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dziembowski, W. A., Goode, P. R., Kosovichev, A. J., & Schou, J. 2001, ApJ, 553, 897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emilio, M., Kuhn, J. R., Bush, R. I., & Scherrer, P. 2000, ApJ, 543, 1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emilio, M. & Leister, N. V. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emilio, M., Bush, R. I., Kuhn, J. R., & Scherrer, P. 2007, ApJ, 660, L161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, R. L. 1980, ApJ, 248, 1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, J. R., Bush, R. I., Scherrer, P., & Scheick, X. 1998, Nature, 392, 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, J. R., Bush, R. I., Emilio, M., & Scherrer, P. H. 2004, ApJ, 613, 1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, J. R., Emilio, M., & Bush, R. I. 2009, Science, 324, 1143-bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclare, F., Delmas, C., Coin, J. P., & Irbah, A. 1996, Solar Phys., 166, 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmann, A. D. & Bianda, M. 2000, In: Proceedings of the 1st Solar and Space Weather Euroconference, ESA SP 463, 113Google Scholar
Scherrer, P. H., Bogart, R. S., Bush, R. I., Hoeksema, J. T., Kosovichev, A. G., Schou, J., Rosenberg, W., Springer, L., Tarbell, T. D., Title, A., Wolfson, C. J., Zayer, I., & MDI Engineering Team 1995, Solar Phys., 162, 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schou, J., Kosovichev, A. G., Goode, P. R., & Dziembowski, W. A. 1997, ApJ, 489, 197Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. I. 1980, Science, 208, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, R. K. & Bertello, L. 1995, Nature, 377, 214CrossRefGoogle Scholar