Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:33:05.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Path from AMANDA to IceCube

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2013

Albrecht Karle
Albrecht Karle*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In May 2011, IceCube, a neutrino telescope with one cubic kilometer instrumented volume started full operation with 5,160 sensors. The plan to build an experiment of this scale was based in part on the successful realization of a prototype experiment, the Antarctic Muon and Neutrino Detector Array. Here, we will review some of the major challenges and milestones.

Keywords

Neutrino
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S288: Astrophysics from Antarctica , August 2012 , pp. 98 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Abbasi, R., et al.(IceCube Collaboration) 2012, Astropart. Phys. 35, 615Google Scholar
Abbasi, R., et al.(IceCube Collaboration) 2011a, ApJ 732, 18Google Scholar
Abbasi, R., et al.(IceCube Collaboration) 2011b, Phys. Rev. D 83, 012001Google Scholar
Abbasi, R., et al.(IceCube Collaboration) 2011c, Phys. Rev. D 83, 092003Google Scholar
Allison, P., et al.(ARA Collaboration) 2012, Astropart. Phys. 35, 457Google Scholar
Akhmedov, E. Kh., Razzaque, S., & Smirnov, A. Yu. 2012, submitted; arXiv: 1205.7071Google Scholar
Andres, E., et al.(AMANDA Collaboration) 2001, Nature 410, 441Google Scholar
Askaryan, G. A. 1962, Soviet Physics, JTEP 14, 441Google Scholar
Askebjer, P., et al.(AMANDA Collaboration) 1995, Science 267, 1147Google Scholar
Auger Collaboration 2011, Phys. Rev. D 84, 122005; Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 85 029902(E)Google Scholar
Avrorin, A. V., et al.(Baikal Collaboration) 2009, Astron. Lett., 35, 651Google Scholar
Engel, R., Seckel, D., & Stanev, T., 2001, Phys. Rev. D 64, 093010Google Scholar
Gaisser, T., these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Gorham, P. W., et al.(ANITA Collaboration) 2010, Phys. Rev. D 82, 022004Google Scholar
Honda, M., et al. 2007, Phys. Rev. D 75, 043006Google Scholar
Kravchenko, I., et al. 2012, Phys. Rev D, in press; arXiv:1106.1164Google Scholar
Lowder, D. M., et al. 1991, Nature 353, 331Google Scholar
Sarcevic, I., et al. 2008, Phys. Rev. D 78, 043005Google Scholar
Spiering, C. & Katz, U., 2012, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 651Google Scholar
Stecker, F. W., 2005, Phys. Rev. D 72, 107301Google Scholar
Waxman, E. & Bahcall, J., 1998, Phys. Rev. D 59, 023002Google Scholar