Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:36:51.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Planetary Nebulae in Extragalactic Young Star Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2006

S. S. Larsen
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, University of Utrecht, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands, email: larsen@astro.uu.nl
T Richtler
Affiliation:
Astronomy Group, Universidad de Concepción, Departamento de Física, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile, email: tom@mobydick.cfm.udec.cl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have recently obtained optical spectra for a large sample of young and intermediate-age star clusters in several nearby galaxies. The main aim of this programme is to carry out a detailed test of photometric and spectroscopic age- and metallicity indicators, but a first inspection of the data has also revealed emission lines in 3 clusters with ages of 30 Myrs or older. We identify these three objects as likely Planetary Nebula (PN) candidates and discuss their properties. Based on the cluster ages, the progenitor stars had initial masses in the range 3 to 7 M, while the PN central stal luminosities and temperatures (estimated from emission line fluxes) are consistent with current masses close to 0.60 M. These objects represent a rare opportunity to study PNe whose progenitor stars are known to be of intermediate masses, although detailed analysis is challenging because of the strong underlying stellar continuum from the cluster stars. Detection of 3 PNe in our sample appears consistent with expectations from stellar evolutionary theory.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Dopita, M. A., Jacoby, G. H., & Vassiliadis, E. 1992, ApJ 389, 27Google Scholar
Ferrario, L., Wickramasinghe, D., Liebert, J., & Williams, K. A. 2005, MNRAS 361, 1131Google Scholar
Girardi, L., Bertelli, G., Bressan, A. et al. 2002, A&A 391, 195Google Scholar
González-Delgado, R. M., Cervino, M., Martins, L. P., Leitherer, C., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2005, MNRAS 357, 945Google Scholar
Jacoby, G. H., Morse, J. A., Kellar Fullton, L., Kwitter, K. B., & Henry, R. B. C. 1997, AJ 114, 2611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, S.S. & Richtler, T. 2006, A&A 459, 103Google Scholar
Letarte, B., Hill, V., Jablonka, P., et al. 2006, A&A 453, 547Google Scholar
O'Dell, C. R. 1963, PASP 75, 370Google Scholar
Pedreros, M. 1987, AJ 94, 92Google Scholar
Pedreros, M. 1989, AJ 98, 2146Google Scholar
Salasnich, B., Girardi, L., Weiss, A., & Chiosi, C. 2000, A&A 361, 1023Google Scholar
Schönberner, D., & Blöcker, T 1996, Ap&SS 245, 201Google Scholar
Vassiliadis, E., & Wood, P. R. 1994, ApJS 92, 125Google Scholar
Weidemann, V. 2000, A&A 363, 647Google Scholar