Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T01:32:40.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Planetesimal Capture by an Evolving Giant Gaseous Protoplanet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Morris Podolak
Affiliation:
Dept. of Geophysical, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel email: morris@post.tau.ac.il
Nader Haghighipour
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy and NASA Astrobiology Institute, University of Hawaii-Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822 email: nader@ifa.hawaii.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Both the core-accretion and disk-instability models suggest that at the last stage of the formation of a gas-giant, the core of this object is surrounded by an extended gaseous envelope. At this stage, while the envelope is contracting, planetesimals from the protoplanetary disk may be scattered into the protoplanets atmosphere and deposit some or all of their materials as they interact with the gas. We have carried out extensive simulations of approximately 104 planetesimals interacting with a envelope of a Jupiter-mass protoplanet including effects of gas drag, heating, and the effect of the protoplanets extended mass distribution. Simulations have been carried out for different radii and compositions of planetesimals so that all three processes occur to different degrees. We present the results of our simulations and discuss their implications for the enrichment of ices in giant planets. We also present statistics for the probability of capture (i.e. total mass-deposition) of planetesimals as a function of their size, composition, and closest approach to the center of the protoplanetary body.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Boss, A. P., 2000a, ApJ, 536, L101Google Scholar
Boss, A. P., 2000b, Earth Moon Planets, 81, 19Google Scholar
Haghighipour, N. & Boss, A. P., 2003, ApJ 2003 583, 996Google Scholar
Hayashi, C., 1981, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 70, 35Google Scholar
Helled, R., Podolak, M., & Kovetz, A., 2006, Icarus, 185, 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helled, R., Podolak, M., & Kovetz, A., 2008, Icarus, 195, 863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öpik, E. J., 1958. Physics of Meteor Flight in the Atmosphere, Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Podolak, M., Pollack, J. B., & Reynolds, R. T., 1988, Icarus, 73, 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saumon, D. & Guillot, T., 2004, ApJ, 609, 1170Google Scholar
Weidenschilling, S. J., 1977a, Astrophys. Space Sci., 51, 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidenschilling, S. J., 1977b, MNRAS, 180, 57Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L., 1972, in: Elvius, A., ed., From Plasma to Planet, p. 211.Google Scholar
Young, P. A., Highberger, J. L., Arnett, D., & Ziurys, L. M., 2003, ApJ, 597, L53Google Scholar