Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:10:52.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population synthesis of young neutron stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

Andrei P. Igoshev
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Saint Petersburg State University email: ignotur@gmail.com
Alexander F. Kholtygin
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Saint Petersburg State University email: ignotur@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate the fortune of young neutron stars (NS) in the whole volume of the Milky Way with new code for population synthesis. We start our modeling from the birth of massive OB stars and follow their motion in the Galaxy up to the Supernova explosion. Next we integrate the equations of motion of NS in the averaged gravitational potential of the Galaxy. We estimate the mean kick velocities from a comparison the model Z and R-distributions of radio emitting NS with that for galactic NS accordingly ATNF pulsar catalog. We follow the history of the rotational velocity and the surface magnetic field of NS taking into account the significant magnetic field decay during the first million year of a neutron star's life. The derived value for the mean time of ohmic decay is 2.3ċ105 years. We model the subsample of galactic radio pulsars which can be detected with available radio telescopes, using a radio beaming model with inhomogeneous distribution of the radio emission in the cone. The distributions functions of the pulsar periods P, period derivatives Ṗ and surface magnetic fields B appear to be in a close agreement with those obtained from an ensemble of neutron stars in the ATNF catalogue.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Manchester, R. N., Hobbs, G. B., Teoh, A., & Hobbs, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993Google Scholar
Cordes, J. M. & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, ArXiv:0207156Google Scholar
Lorimer, D. R., Faulkner, A. J., Lyne, A. G., Manchester, R. N., Kramer, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Hobbs, G., Possenti, A., Stairs, I. H., Camilo, F., Burgay, M., D'Amico, N., Corongiu, A., & Crawford, F., 2002, MNRAS 372, 777800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faucher-Giguere, C. A. & Kaspi, V. M. 2006, ApJ 643, 1, 332355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popov, S. B., Pons, J. A., Miralles, J. A., Boldin, P. A., & Posselt, B. 2010, MNRAS 401, 4, 26752686Google Scholar
Igoshev, A. P. & Kholtygin, A. F. 2011, AN 332, 9/10, 1012Google Scholar
Maciesiak, K. & Gil, J. 2011, MNRAS 417, 2, 14441453Google Scholar
Rankin, J. M. 1990, ApJ 352, 247257Google Scholar