Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:07:48.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Precise distances to red giant stars with seismic data using the near-IR surface-brightness relation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Jesper Storm
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam, Germany, email: jstorm@aip.de
Dariusz Graczyk
Affiliation:
Universidad de Concepción, Chile Millenium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS), Concepción, Chile Centrum Astronomiczne im. Mikołaja Kopernika (CAMK), Warsaw, Poland
Marica Valentini
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam, Germany, email: jstorm@aip.de
Friedrich Anders
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam, Germany, email: jstorm@aip.de
Cristina Chiappini
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam, Germany, email: jstorm@aip.de
Wolfgang Gieren
Affiliation:
Universidad de Concepción, Chile Millenium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS), Concepción, Chile
Grzegorz Pietrzynski
Affiliation:
Universidad de Concepción, Chile Centrum Astronomiczne im. Mikołaja Kopernika (CAMK), Warsaw, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Kepler and CoRoT satellites have determined precise asteroseismic radii for large samples of red giant stars. Combining these data with data from spectroscopic and photometric surveys has led to precise distance determinations using comprehensive Bayesian methods. Here we determine angular diameters and thus distances using the interferometrically calibrated near-IR surface-brightness method finding good agreement with previous results. The method can easily be reversed when accurate Gaia parallaxes for these stars become available to calibrate the asteroseismic scaling relations.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Anders, F., Chiappini, C., Rodrigues, T., et al., 2017, A&A, 597, A30Google Scholar
di Benedetto, G. P., 2005, MNRAS, 357, 858Google Scholar
Casagrande, L., Ramirez, I., Melendez, J., et al., 2010, A&A, 512, A54Google Scholar
Gonzales Hernandez, J. I. & Bonifacio, P., 2009, A&A, 497, 497Google Scholar
Pietrzynski, G., Graczyk, D., Gieren, W., et al., 2013, Nature, 495, 76Google Scholar
Pinsonneault, M. H., Elsworth, Y., Epstein, C., et al., 2014, ApJS, 215, 19Google Scholar
Rodrigues, T. S., Girardi, L., Miglio, A., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2758Google Scholar