Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:13:18.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulsation-Initiated Mass Loss in Luminous Blue Variables: A Parameter Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

Andrew J. Onifer
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Department of Physics, PO Box 118440, Gainesville, FL 32611USA email: onifer@phys.ufl.edu
Joyce A. Guzik
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Thermonuclear Applications Group (X-2), PO Box 1663, MS T085, Los Alamos, NM 87545USA email: joy@lanl.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Luminous blue variables (LBVs) are characterized by semi-periodic episodes of enhanced mass-loss, or outburst. The cause of these outbursts has thus far been a mystery. One explanation is that they are initiated by κ-effect pulsations in the atmosphere caused by a blocking of luminosity at temperatures near the so-called “iron bump” (T ~ 200,000 K), where the Fe opacity suddenly increases and blocks the luminosity. Due to a lag in the onset of convection, the luminosity can build until it exceeds the Eddington limit locally, seeding pulsations and possibly driving some mass from the star. We present preliminary results from a parameter study focusing on the conditions necessary to trigger normal S-Dor type (as opposed to extreme η-Car type) outbursts. We find that as Y increases or Z decreases, the pulsational amplitude decreases and outburst-like behavior, indicated by a large, sudden increase in photospheric velocity, becomes less likely.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Böhm-Vitense, E. 1958, ZfA, 46, 108Google Scholar
Cox, J. P. & Giuli, R. T. 1968, Principles of stellar structure (New York: Gordon and Breach)Google Scholar
Cox, A. N. & Ostlie, D. A. 1993, Ap&SS, 210, 311Google Scholar
Guzik, J. A. 2005, in: Humphreys, R. & Stanek, K. (eds.), The Fate of the Most Massive Stars (San Francisco: ASP), ASP Conf. Ser., 332, 208Google Scholar
Guzik, J. A., Cox, A. N., & Despain, K. M. 2005, in: Humphreys, R. & Stanek, K. (eds.), The Fate of the Most Massive Stars (San Francisco: ASP), ASP Conf. Ser., 332, 263Google Scholar
Guzik, J. A. & Swenson, F. J. 1997, ApJ, 491, 967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzik, J. A., Watson, L. S., & Cox, A. N. 2005, ApJ, 627, 1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iben, I. Jr., 1965, ApJ, 142, 1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias, C. A. & Rogers, F. J. 1996, ApJ, 464, 943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuijzen, H. & de Jager, C. 1990, A&A, 231, 134Google Scholar
Ostlie, D. A. 1990, in: Buchler, J. R. (ed.), Numerical Modeling of Nonlinear Stellar Pulsations: Problems and Prospects (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, J. S. & de Koter, A. 2002, A&A, 393, 543Google Scholar