Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-g9frx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T12:12:28.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signature of local (turbulent) dynamo on middle and small scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2024

V. I. Abramenko Open the ORCID record for V. I. Abramenko [Opens in a new window]
V. I. Abramenko*
Affiliation:
Crimean Astrophysical Observatory of Russian Academy of Sciences, Nauchny, Russia
*
email: vabramenko@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The solar dynamo is a physical process of magnetic field generation due to conversion of kinetic energy of plasma flows into magnetic energy. However, in the mean-field dynamo theory, one needs to segregate scales and consider separately large-scale dynamo and small-scale dynamo. The large-scale dynamo produces the large-scale mean field and unavoidable fluctuations of the mean field. Both are cycle-dependent. The small-scale dynamo is supposed to produce only the small-scale field, and this field is cycle-independent. There is no sharp boundary between the intervals of the large-scale and small-scale dynamos. An unavoidable presence of a smooth transition implies that there is a region where the properties of the large-scale global dynamo and fluctuations inherent to small-scale dynamo co-exist on some intermediate scales. Recent achievements in observations of the small-scale dynamo operation on the smallest observable scales and on the intermediate scales of typical active regions are discussed in the review.

Keywords

Sun:magnetic fieldsSun:dynamoturbulence
Type
Contributed Paper
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 19 , Symposium S365: Dynamics of Solar and Stellar Convection Zones and Atmospheres , December 2023 , pp. 261 - 268
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Abramenko, V., Yurchyshyn, V., and Goode, P.R. 2012, 4th Hinode Science Meeting: Unsolved Problems and Recent Insights, 455, 17.Google Scholar
Abramenko, V.I. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 3698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramenko, V.I. and Yurchyshyn, V.B. : 2020, MNRAS, 497, 5405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramenko, V.I., Suleymanova, R.A., Zhukova, A.V. 2023, MNRAS,518, 4746.Google Scholar
Babcock, H.W. 1961, A&A, 133, 572.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G.K. 1950, RSPSA, 201,405.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, A. 2003, Turbulence and Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics, Edited by Falgarone, E., and Passot, T. ., LNP, 614, 402.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, A. and Subramanian, K. 2005, Phys. Rep., 417, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, W., Goode, P.R., Ahn, K., Gorceix, N., Schmidt, W., and Lin, H. 2012, Second ATST-EAST Meeting: Magnetic Fields from the Photosphere to the Corona, 463, 291.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, F. 1999, ApJ, 515, L39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charbonneau, P. 2020, LRSP, 17, 4.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, R. and Tsuneta, S. 2010, ApJ, 718, L171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, C. and Wang, J. : 2015, ApJ, 806, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, C.L., Wang, J.X., Song, Q., and Zhao, H. 2011, ApJ, 731, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazantsev, A.P. 1968, JETP, 26, 1031.Google Scholar
Kitiashvili, I.N., Kosovichev, A.G., Mansour, N.N., and Wray, A.A. 2015, ApJ, 809, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. 1941, Akad Nauk SSSR Doklady, 30, 301.Google Scholar
Meneguzzi, M., Frisch, U., and Pouquet, A. 1981, Phys. Rev., 47, L1060.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y. and Priest, E.R. 1973, ApJ, 179, 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obridko, V.N., Livshits, I.M., and Sokoloff, D.D. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 2575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovay, K. and Szakaly, G. 1993, A&A, 274, 543.Google Scholar
Pietarila Graham, J., Cameron, R., and Schüssler, M. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rempel, M. 2014, ApJ, 789, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schou, J., Borrero, J.M., Norton, A.A., Tomczyk, S., Elmore, D., and Card, G.L. 2012, SoPh, 275, 327.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, D., Khlystova, A., and Abramenko, V. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenflo, J.O. 2012, A&A, 541, A17.Google Scholar
van Driel–Gesztelyi, L., Green, L.M. 2015, LRSP,12, 1.Google Scholar
Vögler, A., Schüssler, M. 2007, A&A, 465, L43.Google Scholar