Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:35:17.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Spitzer study of interacting luminous and ultra-luminous infrared galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2012

João Rodrigo S. Leão
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG, Instituto de Matemática, Estatística e Fśica - IMEF Caixa Postal 474, Campus Carreiros, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil email: joaoleao@furg.br
Claus Leitherer
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD, USA email: leitherer@stsci.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We conducted a Spitzer Space Telescope survey of 28 Luminous (11 < log (LIR/L) < 12, LIRGs) and Ultra-Luminous Infrared Galaxies (log (LIR/L) > 12, ULIRGs). Many of these galaxies are found in pairs or associations and are powered by either nuclear activity or star-formation (Sanders & Mirabel 1996). Our main goal is to understand the relative importance of starbursts and AGNs in interacting systems. Is the frequency of AGN and starbursts in these interacting galaxies related to their luminosities? What is the importance of the merger stage and the frequency of AGNs? We present our conclusions and diagnostic diagrams based in the observed near infrared lines and compare to studies based solely in optical data.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Sanders, D. B., Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARAA, 34, 749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leão, J. R. S. & Leitherer, C. 2005, General Obs. Proposal 20589, Spitzer Space TelescopeGoogle Scholar
Leão, J. R. S. & Leitherer, C., 2008, General Obs. Proposal 20589, Final Report, Spitzer Space TelescopeGoogle Scholar
Bushouse, H. et al. ApJ, 138, 1Google Scholar
Arribas, S., Bushouse, H., & Lucas, R. A. 2004, ApJ, 127, 2522Google Scholar
Genzel, R. & Cesarsky, C. 2000, ARAA, 38, 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., Neugebauer, G., & Matthews, K. 1988, ApJ, 328, L35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D. C., Veilleux, S., & Sanders, D. B. 1998, ApJ, 508, 627CrossRefGoogle Scholar