Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:48:12.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure of the nuclear stellar cluster of the Milky Way galaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2014

Devaky Kunneriath
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, AS CR, Prague, Czech Republic email: devaky@astro.cas.cz
Rainer Schödel
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Granada, Spain
Susan Stolovy
Affiliation:
El Camino College, California, U. S. A.
Anja Feldmeier
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory (ESO), Garching, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nuclear star clusters are unambiguously detected in about 50–70% of spiral and spheroidal galaxies. They have typical half-light radii of 2–5 pc, dynamical mass ranging from 106 – 107 M, are brighter than globular clusters, and obey similar scaling relations with host galaxies as supermassive black holes. The nuclear stellar cluster (NSC) which surrounds Sgr A*, the SMBH at the center of our galaxy, is the nearest nuclear cluster to us, and can be resolved to scales of milliparsecs. The strong and highly variable extinction towards the Galactic center makes it very hard to infer the intrinsic properties of the NSC (structure and size). We attempt a new way to infer its properties by using Spitzer MIR images in a wavelength range 3–8 μm where the extinction is at a minimum, and the NSC clearly stands out as a separate structure. We present results from our analysis, including extinction-corrected images and surface brightness profiles of the central few hundred parsecs of the Milky Way.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Diolaiti, E., Bendinelli, O., Bonaccini, D., et al. 2000, A&AS 147, 335Google Scholar
Fritz, T. K., Gillessen, S., Dodds-Eden, K., et al. 2011, ApJ 737, 73Google Scholar
Gosling, A. J., Bandyopadhyay, R. M., & Blundell, K. M. 2009, MNRAS 394, 2247Google Scholar
Graham, A. W. & Spitler, L. R. 2009, MNRAS 397, 1003Google Scholar
Kurucz, R. L. 1993, VizieR Online Data Catalog, VI/039Google Scholar
Launhardt, R., Zylka, R., & Mezger, P. G. 2002, A&A 384, 112Google Scholar
Markwardt, C. B. 2009, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII ASP Conference Series 411, 251Google Scholar
Rieke, G. H. & Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, ApJ 288, 618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schödel, R., Merritt, D., & Eckart, A. 2009, A&A 502, 91Google Scholar
Schödel, R., Najarro, F., Muzic, K., & Eckart, A. 2010, A&A 511, 13Google Scholar
Schödel, R. 2011, ASP-CS 439, 222Google Scholar
Stolovy, S., Ramirez, S., Arendt, R. G., et al. 2006, Journal of Physics Conference Series 54, 176Google Scholar
Subr, L., Karas, V. & Hure, J.-M. 2004, MNRAS 354, 1177Google Scholar
Trippe, S., Gillessen, S., Gerhard, O. E., et al. 2008, A&A 492, 419Google Scholar