Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:15:55.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematics of jets using multi-wavelength data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2015

Prajval Shastri ,
Estrella Jimenez Gomez ,
Maitrayee Gupta  and
Grzegorz Madejski
Prajval Shastri
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore 560034, India email: prajval.shastri@gmail.com Kavli Institute of Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto CAUSA
Estrella Jimenez Gomez
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore 560034, India email: prajval.shastri@gmail.com
Maitrayee Gupta
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore 560034, India email: prajval.shastri@gmail.com
Grzegorz Madejski
Affiliation:
Kavli Institute of Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto CAUSA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate the systematics of the properties of highly relativistic jets at multiple frequencies, including Fermi, and MOJAVE data. We test the hypothesis that the blazar divide constitutes a dichotomy. We also explore possible measures of the Doppler factor for these highly Doppler-beamed active galactic nuclei.

Keywords

galaxies: activegalaxies: jets
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Issue S313: Extragalactic jets from every angle , September 2014 , pp. 164 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 715, 429Google Scholar
Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Allafort, A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 171Google Scholar
Antonucci, R. 1993, ARAA, 31, 473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blandford, R. D. & Konigl, A. 1979, ApJ, 232, 34Google Scholar
Ghisellini, G., Maraschi, L., & Tavecchio, F. 2009, MNRAS, 396, L105Google Scholar
Kapahi, V. K. & Saikia, D. J. 1982, JA&A, 3, 465Google Scholar
Kharb, P., Lister, M. L., & Cooper, N. J. 2010, ApJ, 710, 764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, D. V., Shastri, P., & Gabuzda, D. C. 2011, ApJ, 731, 68Google Scholar
Lister, M. L., Aller, H. D., Aller, M. F., et al. 2009, AJ, 137, 3718Google Scholar
Middelberg, E., Roy, A. L., Nagar, N. M., et al. 2004, A&A, 417, 925Google Scholar
Nilsson, K., Pursimo, T., Heidt, J., et al. 2003, A&A, 400, 95Google Scholar
Wills, B. J., Wills, D., Breger, M., Antonucci, R. R. J., & Barvainis, R. 1992, ApJ, 398, 454Google Scholar