Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:54:39.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a better understanding of Hipparcos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

F. van Leeuwen
F. van Leeuwen*
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, United Kingdom email: fvl@ast.cam.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The formal errors on the astrometric data in the 1997 publication of the Hipparcos catalogue are, for stars brighter than about magnitude 9, largely the result of inaccuracies in the description of the along-scan attitude of the satellite. A detailed study of the dynamics of the Hipparcos satellite has led to a much improved understanding and modelling of the satellite attitude, taking into account peculiarities in the rotation of the payload (scan-phase jumps) as well as the detections of small hits. A new reduction of the Hipparcos data was initiated, in which the attitude modelling is a direct description of the dynamics of the satellite. In this so-called fully-dynamic attitude modelling the underlying torques acting on the satellite are reconstructed, and rates and error angles are obtained through integrations. Both the hits and the scan-phase jumps could be taken into account in the context of this model. The new model, including the provisions for discontinuities, led to a factor five reduction in the attitude noise. A new reduction, based on a global iterative solution like is also planned for Gaia, was started in 2004, and completed, after some 15 iterations, in 2007. In the process of this reduction, also the sensitivity of the solution to optimal connectivity between the data in the two fields of view was exposed and taken care of, as well as a couple of small-scale calibrations. The latter had not been possible to solve for in the original reductions. In the catalogue that resulted from this new reduction, the errors on the astrometric data for all but stars brighter than magnitude 4, are dominated by photon noise. Error-correlation levels in the underlying abscissa data are down by more than an order of magnitude, and play no longer any significant role. This feature very much simplifies the analysis of, for example, wide-binary stars and open cluster data.

Keywords

space vehiclesinstrumentation: miscellaneoussurveysastrometry
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S248: A Giant Step: from Milli- to Micro-arcsecond Astrometry , October 2007 , pp. 82 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Arenou, F., Lindegren, L., Frœschlé, M., et al. , 1995, A&A, 304, 52Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, A. & van Leeuwen, F., 2003, Space Sci. Rev., 108, 451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESA (ed.) 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues, no. 1200 in SP, ESAGoogle Scholar
Fantino, E. & van Leeuwen, F., 2003, Space Sci.Rev., 108, 499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, A. & Makarov, V.V., Nov. 2007, ApJS, 173, 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jancart, S., Jorissen, A., Babusiaux, C., & Pourbaix, D., Oct. 2005, A&A, 442, 365Google Scholar
Knapp, G., Pourbaix, D., Jorissen, A., 2001, A&A, 371, 222Google Scholar
Knapp, G. R., Pourbaix, D., Platais, I., & Jorissen, A., 2003, A&A, 403, 993Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, F., Fantino, E., 2003, Space Sci. Rev., 108, 537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, F. & Penston, M. J., 2003, Space Sci. Rev., 108, 471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindegren, L., 1995, A&A, 304, 61Google Scholar
van der Marel, H. & Petersen, C. S., 1992, A&A, 258, 60Google Scholar
O'Mullane, W., Lammers, U., Bailer-Jones, C., et al. , 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-printsGoogle Scholar
Pan, X., Shao, M., & Kulkarni, S. R., 2004, Nature, 427, 326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinsonneault, M. H., Staufer, J., Soderblom, D. R., King, J. R., & Hanson, R. B., 1998, ApJ, 504, 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platais, I., Pourbaix, D., Jorissen, A., et al. , Jan. 2003, A&A, 397, 997Google Scholar
Pourbaix, D., Platais, I., Detournay, S., et al. , Mar. 2003, A&A, 399, 1167Google Scholar
Soderblom, D.R., Nelan, E., Benedict, G.F., et al. , Mar. 2005, AJ, 129, 1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, F., Aug. 2005, A&A, 439, 805Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, F., Nov. 2007a, A&A, 474, 653Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, F., Sep. 2007b, Hipparcos, the New Reduction of the Raw Data, Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, F. & Fantino, E., Aug. 2005, A&A, 439, 791Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, F., Feast, M. W., Whitelock, P. A., & Laney, C. D., Aug. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 723CrossRefGoogle Scholar