Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:09:13.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uneven Cooling: The influence of atmospheric dynamics on the thermal evolution of gas giants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

Emily Rauscher
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, 4 Ivy Lane, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. email: rauscher@astro.princeton.edu
Adam P. Showman
Affiliation:
Lunar & Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721, U.S.A. email: showman@lpl.arizona.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Planets cool and contract as they age, with a cooling rate that depends on the efficiency with which they can transport heat out to space, first through the convective interior and then radiatively out through the atmosphere. The bottleneck for this cooling is the radiative-convective boundary (RCB), where the heat transport is the least efficient. Due to differential heating and atmospheric dynamics, the depth of the RCB can vary with latitude and longitude, meaning that the actual global cooling rate may differ from what would be calculated assuming a spherically symmetric RCB, as in 1D evolutionary models. Here we present models of the deep atmosphere of a generic hot Jupiter, calculate inhomogeneity in the RCB, and determine the resulting effect on the global thermal evolution. Although this issue can apply to any differentially heated gas giant, we focus on the hot Jupiter class of planet because: 1) the thick radiative zones above their deep RCBs can have a stronger influence on deforming the surface of the RCB than would generally be the case for a less-irradiated planet, and 2) an uneven RCB should increase the cooling rate, potentially exacerbating the mismatch between the large radii measured for some hot Jupiters and the smaller radii expected from evolutionary models.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Arras, P. & Bildsten, L. 2006, ApJ, 650, 394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budaj, J., Hubeny, I., & Burrows, A. 2012, A&A, 537, A115Google Scholar
Guillot, T. & Showman, A. P. 2002, A&A, 385, 156Google Scholar
Rauscher, E. & Menou, K. 2012, ApJ, 750, 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showman, A. P., Fortney, J. J., Lian, Y., Marley, M. S., Freedman, R. S., Knutson, H. A., & Charbonneau, D. 2009, ApJ, 699, 564Google Scholar
Spiegel, D. S. & Burrows, A. 2013, arXiv:1303.0293Google Scholar