Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:42:32.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Eco-Knowledge Tool to Support Eco-Design Implementation Inside Design Departments

Part of: Responsible Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Marta Rossi ,
Claudio Favi ,
Anna Costanza Russo  and
Michele Germani
Marta Rossi*
Affiliation:
Università Politecnica delle Marche - Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, via Brecce Bianche 12, 60131 Ancona, Italy;
Claudio Favi
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Parma - Department of Engineering and Architecture, Parco Area delle Scienze 181/A, Parma, Italy
Anna Costanza Russo
Affiliation:
Università Politecnica delle Marche - Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, via Brecce Bianche 12, 60131 Ancona, Italy;
Michele Germani
Affiliation:
Università Politecnica delle Marche - Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, via Brecce Bianche 12, 60131 Ancona, Italy;
*
Contact: Rossi, Marta, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences Italy, marta.rossi@univpm.it

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In last years, an increasing attention on environmental matters is registered. Companies face environmental matters to increase the environmental performances of their products, forced by numerous legislations, normative and protocols and induced to the growing attention of consumers toward environmentally friendly products. However, observing the industrial context, it emerges there are several barriers for implementation of eco-design strategies inside design departments. The paper presents a tool which aims at both providing a basic guide on environmental sustainability issues and favouring the knowledge sharing among the different actors of the product design process. The core of the tool is a repository in which company materials, organized and collected in different forms, are collected. The repository contains several parts: training, guidelines, knowledge and milestone, accordingly to the type, structure and form of materials stored. The eco-design tool functions, structure, and workflow are presented and then preliminary test cases are described.

Keywords

EcodesignSustainabilityDesign engineering
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 3151 - 3160
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Ardente, F., Wolf, M.A., Mathieux, F. and Pennington, D. (2011), “In-depth analysis of the measurement and verification approaches, identification of the possible gaps and recommendations”, European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Deliverable 2 of the project “Integration of resource efficiency and waste management criteria in the implementing measures under the Ecodesign Directive”, 2011.Google Scholar
Asrar-ul-Haq, M. and Anwar, S. (2016), “A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges”, Cogent Business & Management, Vol. 3, pp. 1127744, https://doi/org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1127744Google Scholar
Azevedo, S.G., Carvalho, H., Duarte, S. and Cruz-Machado, V. (2012), “Influence of green and lean upstream supply chain management practices on business sustainability”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 59 No. 4, pp. 753–765. https://doi/org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2189108Google Scholar
Baoucha, Y., Pourroy, F., Zwolinski, P. and Brissaud, D. (2014), “Identifying the Requirements for a Knowledge-Sharing Platform in Ecodesign”, CIRP Conference, Vol. 21, pp. 427–431. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.057Google Scholar
Baumann, H., Boons, F. and Bragd, A. (2002), “Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives”, J. Clean. Prod., Vol. 10, pp. 409–425. https://doi/org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00015-XGoogle Scholar
Bey, N., Hauschild, M. A. and McAloone, T. C. (2013), “Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 62, pp. 43–46. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.001Google Scholar
Bischof, A. and Blessing, L. (2008), “Guidelines for the development of flexible products”, International DESIGN conference, DESIGN 2008.Google Scholar
Bonou, A., Skelton, K. and Olsen, S.I. (2016), “Ecodesign framework for developing wind turbines”, J. Clean. Prod., http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.093Google Scholar
Bonjour, E., Geneste, L., Bergmann, R. (2014), “Enhancing experience reuse and learning”, Knowl.-Based Syst, Vol. 68, pp. 1–114, Edited by Eric Bonjour, Laurent Geneste, Ralph Bergmann.Google Scholar
Bonvoisin, J., Mathieux, F., Domingo, L. and Brissaud, D. (2010), “Design for energy efficiency: proposition of a guidelines-based tool”, International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 629–638.Google Scholar
Bovea, M.D. and Perez-Belis, V. (2012), “A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process”, J. Clean. Prod., Vol. 20, pp. 61–71. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012Google Scholar
Briggs, H.C. (2006), “Knowledge Management in the Engineering Design Environment”, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Newport, USA, https://doi/org/10.1080/09544820410001697154Google Scholar
Chevalier, C., Pourry, F., Villenueuve, F. and Du Pasquier, A. (2013), “The Right Knowledge Management Strategy fo Engineering Analysis SME: A Case Study”, CIRP Design Conference, Bochum, Germany, https://doi/org/10.1007/978-3-642-30817-8_80Google Scholar
Dekoninck, E., Domingo, A., O'Hare, L., Pigosso, J. A., Reyes, D. C. A., , T. and Troussier, N. (2016), “Defining the challenges for ecodesign implementation in companies: Development and consolidation of a framework”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 135, pp. 410–425. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.045Google Scholar
Domingo, L., Buckingham, M., Dekoninck, E. and Cornwell, H. (2015), “The importance of understanding the business context when planning ecodesign activities”, J. Ind. Prod. Eng. Vol. 32, pp. 24–32. https://doi/org/10.1080/21681015.2014.1000398Google Scholar
Ecodesign Pilot, http://www.ecodesign.at/pilot/ONLINE/ENGLISH/INDEX.HTM, accessed on January 2018.Google Scholar
Esmi, R. and Ennals, R. (2009), “Knowledge management in construction companies in the UK”, AI and Soc., Vol. 2, pp. 197–203. https://doi/org/10.1007/s00146-009-0202-9Google Scholar
EU (2009a), “European Commission Communication on the sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan”, COM, 2008, 397/3.Google Scholar
EU (2009b), DIRECTIVE 2009/125/EC of the European parliament and of the Council.Google Scholar
EU (2010), Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European parliament and of the Council.Google Scholar
Favi, C., Germani, M., Gregori, F., Mandolini, M., Marconi, M., Marilungo, E., Papetti, A. and Rossi, M. (2017), “Environmental sustainability awareness in product design practices: A survey of italian companies”, ASME Conferences Vol. 4 No. 22, https://doi/org/10.1115/DETC2017-67698Google Scholar
Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D. and Smith, T. (2011), “The influence of consumers’ environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours”, Energy Policy, Vol. 39, pp. 7684–7694. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.002Google Scholar
Garcia-Dieguez, C., Herva, M. and Roca, E. (2016), “A decision support system based on fuzzy reasoning and AHP–FPP for the ecodesign of products: Application to footwear as case study”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 26, pp. 224–234. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.09.043Google Scholar
Hallstedt, S.I., Thompson, A.W. and Lindahl, P. (2013), “Key elements for implementing a strategic sustainability perspective in the product innovation process”, J. Clean. Prod., Vol. 51, pp. 277–288. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.043Google Scholar
Hallstedt, S.I. (2017), “Sustainability criteria and sustainability compliance index for decision support in product development”, J. Clean. Prod., Vol. 140, pp. 251–266. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.068Google Scholar
Ilgin, M.A. and Gupta, S.M. (2010), “Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art”, J. Environ. Manage, Vol. 91, p. 563e591, https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037Google Scholar
Koh, S.-Y., Lee, S.-J., Chang, M.-K., Liang, H.-Y., Lee, S.-H. and Boo, S.-C. (2007a), “Study on the guideline for analyzing ecodesign value system and establishing product design strategy”, IASDR Conference,Google Scholar
Koh, S. C. L., Demirbag, M., Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E. and Zaim, S. (2007b), “The impact of supply chain management practices on performance of SMEs”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 107 No. 1, pp. 103–124.Google Scholar
Le Pochat, S., Bertoluci, G. and Froelich, D. (2007), “Integrating ecodesign by conducting changes in SMEs”, J. Clean. Prod., Vol. 15, p. 671e680, https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.004Google Scholar
Lindahl, M. (2005), “Designers’ utilization of and requirements on Design for Environment (DfE) methods and tools”, International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, https://doi/org/10.1109/ECODIM.2005.1619207Google Scholar
Luttropp, C. and Lagerstedt, J. (2006), “EcoDesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, pp. 1396–1408. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022Google Scholar
Martens, M.L., Carvalho, M.M. (2016), “Key factors of sustainability in project management context: a survey exploring the project managers’ perspective”, Int. J. Proj. Manag., Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 1084–1102. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004Google Scholar
Marsh, J. R. (1997), “The capture and utilisation of experience in engineering design”, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Mathieux, F., Rebitzer, G., Ferrendier, S., Simon, M. and Froelich, D. (2002), “Implementation of ecodesign in the European electr(on)ics industry - A An analysis of the current practices based on cases studies – An analysis of the current practices based on cases studies”, The J. of Sust. Prod. Des., Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 233–245.Google Scholar
Mcharek, M., Toufik, A., Hammadi, M., Choley, J. and Larouci, C. (2018), “Knowledge sharing for mechatronic systems design and optimization”, Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, https://doi/org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.338Google Scholar
Mehzer, T., Abdul-Malak, M.A., Ghosn, I. and Ajam, M. (2005), “Knowledge management in mechanical and industrial engineering consulting: A case study”, J. of Manage. Eng., Vol. 21, pp. 138–147. https://doi/org/10.1080/09544820410001697154Google Scholar
Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1996), “Engineering design: a systematic approach”, 2nd edition, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Pigosso, D.C.A., Rozenfeld, H. and McAloone, T.C. (2013), “Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies”, J. Clean. Prod., https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040Google Scholar
Pigosso, D.C.A., McAloone, T. C. and Rozenfeld, H. (2014), “Systematization of best pratics for ecodesign implementation”, DESIGN 2014, pp. 1651–1662.Google Scholar
Pigosso, D.C.A., McAloone, T.C. and Rozenfeld, H. (2016), “Characterization of the state-ofthe- art and identification of main trends for Ecodesign Tools and Methods: classifying three decades of research and implementation”, J. Indian Inst. Sci., Vol. 95, pp. 405–428.Google Scholar
Robert, K.-H., Broman, G.I. and Basile, G. (2013) “Analyzing the concept of planetary boundaries from a strategic sustainability perspective: how does humanity avoid tipping the planet?”, Ecol. Soc., Vol. 18 No. 2, p. 5, http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05336-180205Google Scholar
Rose, C.M., Beiter, K.A. and Ishii, K. (1999), “Determining end-of-life strategies as a part of product definition”, IEEE, http://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.1999.765879Google Scholar
Rossi, M., Germani, M., Mandolini, M., Marconi, M., Mengoni, M. and Morbidoni, A. (2013), “Eco-design guidelines and eco-knowledge integration in product development process”, ICED, Vol. 5, pp. 161–170.Google Scholar
Russo, D., Birolini, V., Bersano, G. and Schofer, M. (2011), “Integration of TRIZ derived eco-guidelines and Life Cycle Assessment for sustainable design and process”, Int. Conference on Systematic Innovation.Google Scholar
Russo, A.C., Rossi, M., Landi, D., Germani, M. and Favi, C. (2018), “Virtual eco-design: How to use virtual prototyping to develop energy-labelling compliant products”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 69, pp. 668–673. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.076Google Scholar
Santolaria, M., Oliver-Solà, J., Gasol, C. M., Morales-Pinzón, T. and Rieradevall, J. (2011), “Eco-design in innovation driven companies: perception, predictions and the main drivers of integration. The Spanish example”, J. of Clean. Prod. Vol. 19, pp. 1315–1323. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.009Google Scholar
Schulte, J. and Hallstedt, S. (2017), “Challenges and preconditions to build capabilities for sustainable product design”, International Conference on Eng. Des., Vol. 1, ISBN: 978-1-904670-89-6.Google Scholar
Telenko, C., Seepersad, C. C. and Weber, M. E. (2008), “A compilation of design for environment principles and guidelines”, ASME 2008, pp. 289–301. https://doi/org/10.1115/DETC2008-49651Google Scholar
Vezzoli, C. and Sciama, D. (2006), “Life cycle design: from general methods to product type specific guidelines and checklists: a method adopted to develop a set of guidelines/checklist handbook for the eco-efficient design of NECTA vending machines”, J. of Clean. Prod., Vol. 14, pp. 1319–1325. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.011Google Scholar
Witherspoon, C. L., Bergner, J., Cockrell, C. and Stone, D. N. (2013), “Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: a meta-analysis and critique”, J. of Knowledge Manag., Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 250–277. https://doi/org/10.1108/13673271311315204Google Scholar
Wever, R., van Kuijk, J. and Boks, C. (2008), “User-centred design for sustainable behaviour”, Int. J. of Sustain. Eng., Vol. 1, pp. 9–20. https://doi/org/10.1108/02580540810915039Google Scholar
Zhang, L. and Li, X. (2016), “How to reduce the negative impacts of knowledge heterogeneity in engineering design team: exploring the role of knowledge reuse”, Int. J. Proj. Manag., Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 1138–1149. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.009Google Scholar