Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:16:19.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engineers’ and Biologists’ Roles during Biomimetic Design Processes, Towards a Methodological Symbiosis

Part of: Design Creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Eliot Graeff ,
Nicolas Maranzana  and
Améziane Aoussat

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The strength of biomimetics comes from its ability to draw from life mechanisms and strategies to design innovative solutions. In spite of recent methodological progresses, more specifically on tools and processes, biomimetics' implementation still faces strong difficulties. Among other things, design teams have a hard time finding and selecting relevant biological strategies. Facing these challenges, we consider an alternative, yet well recognized, approach: the integration of profiles having a training in natural science within biomimetic design teams. As biologists aren't used to work in design teams, there is a need for a process actually guiding their practice in biomimetics and determining the way they will interact with the “traditional” design team. After studying the literature and asking for experts' opinion on the matter, we introduced a biomimetic design process considering this new profile as an integral part of biomimetic design teams. With the final goal of making biomimetics implementable, this proposed theoretical process is currently tested in both a student and an industrial project in order to optimize our methodological contribution with practical feedbacks.

Keywords

Bio-inspired design / biomimeticsBiologistsDesign processCollaborative designDesign Team
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 319 - 328
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Ahmed-Kristensen, S., Christensen, B.T. and Lenau, T. (2014), “Naturally original: Stimulating creative design through biological analogies and Random images”, International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, pp. 427–436.Google Scholar
Altshuller, G.S. (1988), Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems, Journal of Development Economics, 1 edition., Vol. 91, CRC Press, New York.Google Scholar
Aoussat, A., Christofol, H. and Le Coq, M. (2000), “The new product design - A transverse approach”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 399–417.Google Scholar
Badarnah, L. and Kadri, U. (2015), “A methodology for the generation of biomimetic design concepts”, Architectural Science Review, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 120–133.Google Scholar
Baumeister, D. (2012), Biomimicry Resource Handbook: A seed bank of knowledge and best practices, Biomimicry Resource Handbook, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Missoula, available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Google Scholar
Biomimicry Institue. (2018), “AskNature - Innovation Inspired by Nature”, available at: https://asknature.org/ (accessed 23 November 2018).Google Scholar
Biomimicry Institute. (2002), “AskNature - Innovation Inspired by Nature”, AskNature.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. (2009), “Sapphire – an Approach To Analysis and Synthesis”, Iced’09, No. August, pp. 417–428.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. and Blessing, L.T.M. (2009), “DRM: A Design Reseach Methodology”, DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer London, London, pp. 13–42.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B. and Nataraju, B.S. (2005), “A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas”, Ai Edam, Vol. 19 No. 02, pp. 113–132.Google Scholar
Cheong, H., Chiu, I., Shu, L.H., Stone, R.B. and McAdams, D.A. (2011), “Biologically Meaningful Keywords for Functional Terms of the Functional Basis”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 133 No. 2, p. 021007.Google Scholar
Cheong, H. and Shu, L.H. (2012), “Automatic extraction of causally related functions from natural-language text for biomimetic design”, available at: http://shulab.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/pubs/Cheong_etal_DTM_12.pdf (accessed 23 March 2018).Google Scholar
Cross, N. (1993), “A History of Design Methodology”, Design Methodology and Relationships with Science, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 15–27.Google Scholar
Deldin, J.M. and Schuknecht, M. (2014), “The AskNature Database: Enabling Solutions in Biomimetic Design”, Biologically Inspired Design, Springer, London, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
Fayemi, P.E. (2016), Innovation through Bio-Inspired Design : Suggestion of a Structuring Model for Biomimetic Process and Methods, ENSAM - Paris.Google Scholar
Fayemi, P.E., Wanieck, K., Zollfrank, C., Maranzana, N. and Aoussat, A. (2017), “Biomimetics: Process, tools and practice”, Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, Vol. 12 No. 1, p. 11002.Google Scholar
Gamage, A. and Hyde, R. (2012), “A model based on Biomimicry to enhance ecologically sustainable design”, Architectural Science Review, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 55 No. 3, pp. 224–235.Google Scholar
Goel, A.K., Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B. and Helms, M. (2014), “Information-Processing Theories of Biologically Inspired Design”, Biologically Inspired Design, Springer, London, pp. 127–152.Google Scholar
Graeff, E., Maranzana, N. and Aoussat, A. (2018a), “Role of biologists in biomimetic design processes : preliminary results”, International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, pp. 1149–1160.Google Scholar
Graeff, E., Maranzana, N. and Aoussat, A. (2018b), “Conception biomimétique : quels acteurs pour quelles attentes?”, Confere Conference.Google Scholar
Helfman Cohen, Y. and Reich, , Y. (2016), Biomimetic Design Method for Innovation and Sustainability, available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33997-9Google Scholar
Helms, M., Vattam, S. and Goel, A.K. (2009), “Biologically inspired design: process and products”, Design Studies, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 606–622.Google Scholar
Hoagland, M. and Dodson, D. (1995), The Way Life Works, 1st ed., Crown, New York.Google Scholar
ISO/TC266. (2015), “Biomimétique -Terminologie, concepts et méthodologie”, available at: https://www.iso.org/fr/committee/652577/x/catalogue/.Google Scholar
Ke, J., Wallace, J.S., Chiu, I. and Shu, L.H. (2010), “Supporting Biomimetic Design by Embedding Metadata in Natural-Language Corpora”, Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2010, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Keshwani, S., Lenau, T.A., Ahmed-Kristensen, S. and Chakrabarti, A. (2017), “Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 28 No. 10–12, pp. 654–680.Google Scholar
Kruiper, R., Vincent, J., Abraham, E., Soar, R., Konstas, I., Chen-Burger, J., Desmulliez, M. et al. (2018), “Towards a Design Process for Computer-Aided Biomimetics”, Biomimetics, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Vol. 3 No. 3, p. 14.Google Scholar
Lahonde, N. (2010), Design Process Improvement : Proposal of a Model for Design Methods Selection to Support the Decision, ENSAM - Paris.Google Scholar
Lenau, T. (2009), “Biomimetics as a design methodology - Possibilities and challenges”, International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
Lindemann, U. and Gramann, J. (2004), “Engineering design using biological principles”, International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, pp. 355–360.Google Scholar
Ohno, T. (1978), Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, Productivity Press, 1 edition., Vol. 1, Productivity Press, Cambridge, Mass, available at:https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054703Google Scholar
Schöfer, M. (2015), Processes and Methods for Interdisciplinary Problem Solving and Technology Integration in Knowledge-Intensive Domains, ENSAM - Paris.Google Scholar
Schöfer, M., Maranzana, N., Aoussat, A., Bersano, G. and Buisine, S. (2018), “Distinct and combined effects of disciplinary composition and methodological support on problem solving in groups”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 102–115.Google Scholar
Snell-Rood, E. (2016), “Interdisciplinarity: Bring biologists into biomimetics”, Nature, Vol. 529 No. 7586, pp. 277–278.Google Scholar
Tinsley, A., Midha, P., Nagel, R. and McAdams, D. (2007), “Exploring the Use of Functional Models As a Foundation for Biomimetic Conceptual Design”, ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Vandevenne, D., Verhaegen, P.A., Dewulf, S. and Duflou, J.R. (2015), “A scalable approach for ideation in biologically inspired design”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 29 No. 01, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Vattam, S., Helms, M. and Goel, A.K. (2007), Biologically-Inspired Innovation in Engineering Design: A Cognitive Study, Technical Report, Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, available at: https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14346 (accessed 22 February 2018).Google Scholar
Vattam, S., Helms, M. and Goel, A.K. (2008), “Compound Analogical Design: Interaction between Problem Decomposition and Analogical Transfer in Biologically Inspired Design”, Design Computing and Cognition, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 377–396.Google Scholar
Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B., Helms, M., Goel, A.K. and Yen, J. (2011), “DANE: Fostering Creativity in and through Biologically Inspired Design”, Design Creativity 2010, Springer London, London, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. (2016), “TRIZ as a Primary Tool for Biomimetics”, Research and Practice on the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 225–235.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. and Cavallucci, D. (2018), “Development of an Ontology of Biomimetics Based on Altshuller's Matrix”, Springer, Cham, pp. 14–25.Google Scholar
Vincent, J.F.V. (2017), “The trade-off: a central concept for biomimetics”, Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials, Thomas Telford Ltd, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Vincent, J.F.V., Bogatyreva, O.A., Bogatyrev, N.R., Bowyer, A. and Pahl, A.K. (2006), “Biomimetics: its practice and theory”, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, Vol. 3 No. 9, pp. 471–482.Google Scholar
Wanieck, K., Fayemi, P.E., Maranzana, N., Zollfrank, C. and Jacobs, S. (2017), “Biomimetics and its tools”, Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
Wynn, and Clarkson, . (2005), “Chapter 1 - Models of designing”, Design Process Improvement: A Review of Current Practice, pp. 34–59.Google Scholar