Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:25:25.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Invention Disclosures to Innovation - Challenges in Transforming Practice

Part of: Collaborative Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Senni Kirjavainen  and
Tua A. Björklund

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Adopting design thinking and innovation-oriented approaches in organizations is crucial but not always simple. New practices of collaboration, user-orientedness and exploration require a compatible culture to be successfully integrated into product development. This paper presents a case study based on 12 interviews of employees and managers in a large Finland-based technology company, introducing new ways of working to product development. Silos, focusing on inventions, and a lack of resources for exploration were highlighted as key challenges in transitioning from incremental development to innovations. Perhaps counterintuitively, introducing new ways of working requiring a collaborative culture - the most widely recognized shortcoming in the current practice in the case - were best received, and support and feedback could be found for pilot projects in these arenas. When the gap between the practice and culture was smaller, change efforts could perhaps be more challenging, as there was less of a consensus on a need to change. The results suggest than developers need not automatically shy away from piloting new ways of working even when existing cultures are not compatible.

Keywords

Case studyCollaborationCultural transformationInnovationOrganizational processeslu
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 139 - 148
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Adams, R.S, Turns, J. and Atman, C.J. (2003), “Educating effective engineering designers: the role of reflective practice”, Design Studies, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00056-XGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996), “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 5, p. 1154. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995Google Scholar
Amabile, T.M., Schatzel, E.A., Moneta, G.B. and Kramer, S.J. (2004), “Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: perceived leader support”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003Google Scholar
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K. and Zhou, J. (2014), “Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework”, Journal of Management, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128Google Scholar
Body, J. (2008), “Design in the Australian taxation office”. Design Issues, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.1.55Google Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. (2009), Change by design. Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (1992), “Wicked problems in design thinking”, Design Issues, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 5–21. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474282932.0019Google Scholar
Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M. and Rauth, I. (2014), “Design thinking: Exploring values and effects from an innovation capability perspective”, The Design Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 403–423. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X13982745783000Google Scholar
Carlgren, L., Rauth, I. and Elmquist, M. (2016), “Framing design thinking: The concept in idea and enactment”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153Google Scholar
Carr, S.D., Halliday, A., King, A.C., Liedtka, J., Lockwood, T. (2010), “The influence of design thinking in business: Some preliminary observations”, Design Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00080.xGoogle Scholar
Coakley, L.A., Roberto, M.A. and Segovis, J.C. (2014), “Meeting the Challenge of Developing Innovative Problem-Solving Students Using Design Thinking and Organizational Behavior Concepts”, Business Education Innovation Journal, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 34–43.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2013), “Can design thinking still add value?”, Design Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/drev.10239Google Scholar
Drews, C. (2009), “Unleashing the full potential of design thinking as a business method”, Design Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2009.00020.xGoogle Scholar
Elsbach, K.D. and Stigliani, I. (2018), “Design thinking and organizational culture: A review and framework for future research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 2274–2306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317744252Google Scholar
Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A. and Storbacka, K. (2015), “Managing co-creation design: A strategic approach to innovation”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12087Google Scholar
Gumusluoglu, L. and Ilsev, A. (2009), “Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation”, Journal of business research, Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032Google Scholar
Jung, D.I., Chow, C. and Wu, A. (2003), “The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings”, The leadership quarterly, Vol. 14 No. 4-5, pp. 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(03)00050-xGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. and Wilemon, D. (2002), “Strategic issues in managing innovation's fuzzy front-end”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060210415153Google Scholar
Kotter, J.P. (1995), “Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail”, Harvard Business Review, May-June.Google Scholar
Lewis, M.W., Welsh, M.A., Dehler, G.E. and Green, S.G. (2002), “Product development tensions: exploring contrasting styles of project management”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 546–564. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069380Google Scholar
Liu, Z. and Schonwetter, D. J. (2004), “Teaching creativity in engineering”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 801–808.Google Scholar
Martin, R. L. (2009), The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
McDonough, E.F. III and Barczak, G.B. (1991), “Speeding up new product development: the effects of leadership style and source of technology”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.830203Google Scholar
Micheli, P., Wilner, S.J., Bhatti, S.H., Mura, M. and Beverland, M.B. (2019), “Doing Design Thinking: conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466Google Scholar
Mutanen, U. M. (2008), “Developing organisational design capability in a Finland-based engineering corporation: the case of Metso”, Design Studies, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.005Google Scholar
Perks, H., Cooper, R. and Jones, C. (2005), “Characterizing the role of design in new product development: An empirically derived taxonomy”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00109.xGoogle Scholar
Rauth, I., Carlgren, L. and Elmquist, M. (2015), “Making it happen: Legitimizing design thinking in large organizations,” Design Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmj.12015Google Scholar
Ravasi, D. and Lojacono, G. (2005), “Managing Design and Designers for Strategic Renewal”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2004.11.010Google Scholar
Ravasi, D. and Stigliani, I. (2012), “Product design: A review and research agenda for management studies”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 464–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00330.xGoogle Scholar
Rekonen, S. and Hassi, L. (2018), “Impediments for experimentation in novice design teams”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 6 No. 3-4, pp. 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2018.1448723.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R.K. (2006), “Educating for innovation”, Thinking Skills and Creativity, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 41–48.10.1016/j.tsc.2005.08.001Google Scholar
Seidel, V.P. and Fixson, S.K. (2013), “Adopting Design Thinking in Novice Multidisciplinary Teams: The Application and Limits of Design Methods and Reflexive Practices”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 30, pp. 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12061Google Scholar
Valle, S. and Avella, L. (2003), “Cross-functionality and leadership of the new product development teams”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456319Google Scholar
Vetterli, C., Uebernickel, F., Brenner, W., Petrie, C. and Stermann, D. (2016), “How Deutsche Bank's IT division used design thinking to achieve customer proximity”, MIS Quarterly Executive, Vol. 15, pp. 37–53.Google Scholar