Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:44:03.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional Analysis in Embodiment Design - An Investigation of Embodiment Function Relations in Testing Activities

Part of: Design Methods and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Patric Grauberger ,
Katharina Voß  and
Sven Matthiesen

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Testing contributes to success of engineering design as it plays an important role in gaining insights about the system in development. Literature indicates that for success in engineering design, gaining insights about relations of embodiment and function is crucial. In this contribution, an investigation of how insights about embodiment function relations are gained in testing, is conducted. For this, the testing documentation in a student development project is analysed. The results show a correlation of gaining insights about embodiment function relations to success in engineering design. Potential for improvement in data acquisition and processing is uncovered, which will be used in a succeeding study to investigate this issue in more detail.

Keywords

Embodiment designDesign engineeringFunctional modellingEvaluationDesign methods
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1503 - 1512
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Albers, A. and Wintergerst, E. (2014), “The Contact and Channel Approach (C&C²-A): relating a system's physical structure to its functionality”, In: Chakrabarti, A. and Blessing, L.T.M. (Eds.), An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design: Philosophy, Approaches and Empirical Explorations, Springer, London, pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Behrendt, M., Klingler, S. and Matros, K. (2016), “Verifikation und Validierung im Produktentstehungsprozess”. In: Udo Lindemann (Hg.): Handbuch Produktentwicklung. Munich, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Germany, pp. 543–571.Google Scholar
Andreasen, M.M., Hansen, C.T. and Cash, P. (2015), Conceptual Design: Interpretations, Mindset and Models, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Batliner, M., Boes, S., Heck, J., Meboldt, M. (2019), “Linking Testing Activities to Success in Agile Development of Physical Products”, Research in Engineering Design, in review.Google Scholar
Boes, S., Batliner, M., Stücheli, M. and Meboldt, M. (2017), A Taxonomy of Testing Activities in Product Development, ETH Zurich Research Collechtion, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Camburn, B., Viswanathan, V., Linsey, J., Anderson, D., Jensen, D., Crawford, R., Otto, K. and Wood, K. (2017), “Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines” Des. Sci., vol. 3 No. e13, http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.10Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2013), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis, Hoboken.Google Scholar
DIN 66 001:1983-12: “Informationsverarbeitung: Sinnbilder und ihre Anwendung”Google Scholar
Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001), “Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution”, Design Studies, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 425–437.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2017), Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, Vol. 6, vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Munich, Vienna.Google Scholar
Erbe, T. (2018), “CPM-Modeling in industry - a reflection”, In: Krause, D., Paetzold, K. and Wartzack, S. (Eds.), Design for X: Beiträge zum 29. DfX-Symposium, Tutzing, Germany.Google Scholar
Gero, J. S. and Kannengiesser, U. (2014), “The Function-Behaviour-Structure Ontology of Design”. In: Chakrabarti, A. and Blessing, L.T.M. (Eds.), An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design: Philosophy, Approaches and Empirical Explorations, Springer, London, pp. 263–283.Google Scholar
Hartmann, B., Klemmer, S.R., Bernstein, M., Abdulla, L., Burr, B., Robinson-Mosher, A. and Gee, J. (2006), “Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis”, In: Wellner, P. and Hinckley, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST ‘06, Montreux, Switzerland, 2006, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Hussy, W., Schreier, M., Echterhoff, G. (2013): Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. Vol. 2, überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Klemmer, S.R., Hartmann, B. and Takayama, L. (2006), “How bodies matter”, In: Carroll, J.M., Bødker, S. and Coughlin, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Designing Interactive systems - DIS ‘06, University Park, PA, USA, 26.06.2006 - 28.06.2006, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, p. 140.Google Scholar
Matthiesen, S. (2002), “Ein Beitrag zur Basisdefinition des Elementmodells “Wirkflächenpaare & Leitstützstrukturen” zum Zusammenhang von Funktion und Gestalt technischer Systeme”, Dissertation, Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Maschinenkonstruktionslehre und Kraftfahrzeugbau, University of Karlsruhe (TH), Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
Matthiesen, S. (2011), “Seven Years of Product Development in Industry - Experiences and Requirements for Supporting Engineering Design with ‘Thinking Tools’”, In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design. ICED'11. Copenhagen, Denmark. pp. 236–245.Google Scholar
Matthiesen, S., Grauberger, P., Nelius, T. and Hölz, K. (2017a), “Methodische Unterstützung des Erkenntnisgewinns in der Produktentwicklung durch Konstruktionshypothesen”, KIT Scientific Working Papers, Vol. 61, Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
Matthiesen, S., Grauberger, P., Hölz, K., Nelius, T., Bremer, F., Wettstein, A., Gessinger, A., Pflegler, B., Nowoseltschenko, K., Voß, K. (2018), “Modellbildung mit dem C&C²-Ansatz in der Gestaltung - Techniken zur Analyse und Synthese”. KIT Scientific Working Papers, Vol. 58, Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
Meboldt, M., Matthiesen, S. and Lohmeyer, Q. (2012), “The Dilemma of Managing Iterations in Time-to-market Development Processes”, In: 2nd International Workshop on Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes. MMEP, Cambridge, UK, pp. 127–139.Google Scholar
Müller, R. and Turner, R. (2007), “The Influence of Project Managers on Project Success Criteria and Project Success by Type of Project”, In: European Management Journal Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 298–309.Google Scholar
Otto, K. and Wood, K. (2001), Product Design: techniques in reverse engineering and new Product Development, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Shabi, J. and Reich, Y. (2012), “Developing an analytical model for planning systems verification, validation and testing processes”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 429–438.Google Scholar
Tahera, K., Wynn, D.C., Earl, C. and Eckert, C.M. (2018), “Testing in the incremental design and development of complex products”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 47 No. 2.Google Scholar
Türk, D., Leutenecker, B. and Meboldt, M. (2014), “Experience the relevance of testing in engineering design education”, In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Weber, C. (2014), “Modelling Products and Product Development Based on Characteristics and Properties”, In: Chakrabarti, A. and Blessing, L.T.M. (Eds.), An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design: Philosophy, Approaches and Empirical Explorations, Springer, London, pp. 327–352.Google Scholar
Wynn, D.C., Eckert, C. and Clarkson, P.J. (2007), “Modelling Iteration in Engineering Design”, In: International Conference on Engineering Design. ICED'07. Paris, France.Google Scholar