Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:25:14.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Goal Oriented Provision of Design Principles for Additive Manufacturing to Support Conceptual Design

Part of: Design for Additive Manufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Felix Schumacher ,
Hagen Watschke ,
Sebastian Kuschmitz  and
Thomas Vietor
Felix Schumacher*
Affiliation:
BMW AG;
Hagen Watschke
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig
Sebastian Kuschmitz
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig
Thomas Vietor
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig
*
Contact: Schumacher, Felix, BMW AG, Body, Exterior Trim, Pre-Development Programm, Carbon Fiber Strategy, Germany, felix.fs.schumacher@bmw.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers a new degree in design freedom. However, in order to exploit AM's potentials in end-use products a methodical approach and suitable tools especially during conceptual design are needed. This paper presents a methodology for application in industrial practice, which should support the component conception for additively manufactured products. The approach focuses on a benefit-oriented preparation and provision of knowledge. In addition to general design methods for abstraction and promotion of creativity, AM-specific tools are introduced which support the provision of solution principles and process-specific restrictions. A broad applicability of the solution principles is ensured by an expansion of the solution space through abstraction. Consequently, product developers are sensitised to the new design possibilities of AM, on the one hand. On the other hand, they are supported in a holistic exploitation of design potentials in ideation in order to foster innovative solution ideas. Finally, the methodological procedure and the developed tools will be demonstrated in a workshop by using an example from industrial practice of the automotive sector.

Keywords

Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)Additive ManufacturingCreativityConceptual design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 749 - 758
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Blees, C., Kipp, T., Beckmann, G., Krause, D. (2010), “Development of Modular Product Families: Integration of Design for Variety and Modularization”. Nord Design 2010, (DS, 61), pp. 159–170.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K., Meerkamm, H. (2013), Integrierte Produktentwicklung. Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit., Hanser, München. http://doi.org/10.3139/9783446436275.Google Scholar
Kumke, M., Watschke, H., Hartogh, P., Bavendiek, A.-K., Vietor, T. (2017), “Methods and tools for identifying and leveraging additive manufacturing design potentials”., International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, Vol. 21 No. 6, p. 662. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-017-0399-7.Google Scholar
Laverne, F., Frédéric, S., Gianluca, D'Antonio, Le Marc, C. (2017), “Enriching design with X through tailored additive manufacturing knowledge. A methodological proposal”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 279–288. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-016-0314-7.Google Scholar
Mattmann, I. (2017), Modellintegrierte Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19409-3.Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.-H. (2007), Engineering Design, Springer London, London.Google Scholar
Ponn, J. and Lindemann, U. (2011), Konzeptentwicklung und Gestaltung technischer Produkte, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-20580-4Google Scholar
Pradel, P., Zhu, Z., Bibb, R., Moultrie, J. (2018), “A framework for mapping design for additive manufacturing knowledge for industrial and product design”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 57, pp. 1–36. http://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1483011.Google Scholar
Richter, T., Watschke, H., Schumacher, F. (2018), “Exploitation of potentials of additive manufacturing in ideation workshops”, International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2018), Bath, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Roth, K. (2000), Konstruieren mit Konstruktionskatalogen Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17466-7.Google Scholar
Richter, T., Watschke, H., Inkermann, D., Vietor, T. (2016), “Produktarchitekturgestaltung unter Berücksichtigung additiver Fertigungsverfahren.”, Entwerfen Entwickeln Erleben 2016 - Beitrage zur virtuellen Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik, Dresden, pp. 375–392.Google Scholar
Rodrigue, H., Rivette, M. (2010), “An Assembly-Level Design for Additive Manufacturing Methodology”, Proceedings of IDMME - Virtual Concept, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Schmelzle, J., Kline, E.V., Dickman, C. J., Reutzel, E.W., Jones, G., Simpson, T.W. (2015), “(Re)Designing for Part Consolidation. Understanding the Challenges of Metal Additive Manufacturing”. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 11, p. 111404. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031156.Google Scholar
Schumacher, F., Richter, T., Watschke, H. (2017), “Ein Rahmenwerk zur Wissensbereitstellung für die Nutzung von Potentialen additiver Fertigung in der Produktentwicklung”, Kolloquium Konstruktionstechnik KT 2017, Duisburg-Essen, pp. 131–140.Google Scholar
Simpson, T.W., Jiao, J., Siddique, Z., Hölttä-Otto, K. (2014), Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design. Springer New York, New York, NY.10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6Google Scholar
Ullman, D.G. (2010), The mechanical design process, McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, ISBN-10: 0072975741.Google Scholar
Watts, D.M. and Hague, R.J. (2006), “Exploiting the design freedom of RM”, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Texas, pp. 656–667.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, S. and Seifert, C.M. (2010), “Cognitive Heuristics in Design Ideation”, Proceedings of 11th International Design Conference, May 17–20 2010, Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google Scholar