Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:57:22.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Does Biologically Inspired Design Cope with Multi-Functionality?

Part of: Design Creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Nicklas Svendsen  and
Torben Anker Lenau

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As catalysts for product innovation and product development, different approaches for biologically inspired design (BID) are exciting options. However, while general BID theory require a focus on single functions, real world products are characterized by performing multiple functions. The development of an anterior eye-chamber model is used to showcase the issue.

In a systematic literature review (SLR), state-of-the-art methodologies, methods and tools BID practice are discovered and the current state of multi-functionality in BID are assessed.

The SLR revealed 18 contributions with 8 BID methodologies and 12 stage-specific BID tools (of which 50% addressed the solution search phase) in addition to 5 papers addressing multi-functionality in BID. At present multi-functionality in BID is only treated in a limited set of papers. While designers interested in BID are advised to discover multi-functional analogies, the present approach to handling multi-functional problems in BID suggest functional decomposition and multiple BID efforts. Therefore, the development of design support for handling multi-functional problems, including tools for problem analysis are needed.

Keywords

Bio-inspired design / biomimeticsDesign methodologyDesign processConceptual designMulti-functionality
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 349 - 358
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Badarnah, L. and Kadri, U. (2015), “A methodology for the generation of biomimetic design concepts”, Architectural Science Review, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2014.922458Google Scholar
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2006), “Biomimetics - Using nature to inspire human innovation”, Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, Vol. 1 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/1/1/P01Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. et al. (2006), “A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060405050109Google Scholar
Chiu, I. and Shu, L. (2005), “Bridging cross-domain terminology for biomimetic design”, Proceedings of 2005 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Long Beach, California, USA, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2005-84908Google Scholar
DeLuca, D. (2017), “The power of the Biomimicry Design Spiral”, Biomimicry Inst., https://biomimicry.org/biomimicry-design-spiral/ 10.4324/9781315625508-39Google Scholar
Fayemi, P. E. et al. (2014), “Bio-inspired design characterisation and its links with problem solving tools”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, 2014–January (December 1960), pp. 173–182.Google Scholar
Goel, A. et al. (2016), “Does the Biologically Inspired Design Process Result in More Multifunctional Designs?”, (4th ICDC), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Graeff, E., Maranzana, N. and Aoussat, A. (2018), “Role of biologists in biomimetic design processes : preliminary results”, International Design Conference, pp. 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0426Google Scholar
Hashemi Farzaneh, H. (2016), “Bio-inspired design: Ideation in collaboration between mechanical engineers and biologists”, p. 279.Google Scholar
Helms, M. and Goel, A. K. (2014), “The Four-Box Method: Problem Formulation and Analogy Evaluation in Biologically Inspired Design”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 136 No. 11, p. 111106. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028172Google Scholar
Helms, M., Vattam, S. S. and Goel, A. K. (2009), “Biologically inspired design: process and products”, Design Studies. Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 606–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.04.003Google Scholar
Hui, C. Y. et al. (2018), “A Paper Sensor Printed with Multifunctional Bio/Nano Materials”, Angewandte Chemie, Vol. 130, pp. 4639–4643. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201712903Google Scholar
ISO 18458 (2015), “Biomimetics - Terminology, concepts and methodology”. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0620181Google Scholar
Kennedy, B., Buikema, A. and Nagel, J. K. S. (2015), “Integrating Biology, Design, and Engineering for Sustainable Innovation”, 2015 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference. IEEE, pp. 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2015.7119952Google Scholar
Lenau, T. A. (2009), “Biomimetics as a design methodology - Possibilities and challenges”, International conference on engineering design, (August), pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
Lenau, T. A. et al. (2010), “Engineering design of an adaptive leg prosthesis using biological principles”, 11th International Design Conference (design 2010), pp. 331–340.Google Scholar
Lenau, T. A. (2017), “Do Biomimetic Students Think Outside the Box?”, Vol. 4 No. 21, pp. 543–551.Google Scholar
Lenau, T. A. (2018), “Paradigms for biologically inspired design”. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2296560Google Scholar
Lindemann, U. and Gramann, J. (2004), “Engineering design using biological principles”, International Design Conference, pp. 355–360.Google Scholar
Liu, K. and Jiang, L. (2011a) “Bio-inspired design of multiscale structures for function integration”, Nano Today. Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2011.02.002Google Scholar
Liu, K. and Jiang, L. (2011b) “Multifunctional Integration: From Biological to Bio-Inspired Materials”, Vol. 5 No. 9, pp. 6786–6790. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn203250yGoogle Scholar
Nagel, J. K. S., Stone, R. B. and Mcadams, D. A. (2010), “An Engineering-To-Biology Thesaurus for Engineering Design”, ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conference & Computers and INformation in Engineering Conference, (October), pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28233Google Scholar
Neinhuis, C. and Barthlott, W. (1997), “Characterization and Distribution of Water-repellent, Self-cleaning Plant Surfaces”, pp. 667–677.10.1006/anbo.1997.0400Google Scholar
Samek, A. (2006), “BIONICS IN THE DESIGNING”, General approaches to the design process, pp. 129–135.Google Scholar
Sane, S. P. (2016), “Bioinspiration and biomimicry: What can engineers learn from biologists?”, Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2016.19.1.01Google Scholar
Scali, M. et al. (2017), “Design and evaluation of a wasp-inspired steerable needle”, Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, and Bioreplication. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2259978Google Scholar
SolidCreativity (2014), “Triz40 [online] SolidCreativity”. Available at http://www.triz40.com/TRIZ_GB.php (10 December 2018).Google Scholar
Spiliopoulou, E. et al. (2015), “Intelligent Search for Biologically Inspired Design”, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, pp. 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/2732158.2732182Google Scholar
Tero, A. et al. (2010), “Rules for biologically inspired adaptive network design”, Science, Vol. 327 No. 5964, pp. 439– 442. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177894Google Scholar
Vattam, S. et al. (2010), “DANE: Fostering creativity in and through biologically-inspired design”, Vol. 8 No. November, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
Vattam, S. S. and Goel, A. K. (2013), “Biological solutions for engineering problems: A study in cross-domain textual case-based reasoning”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 7969 LNAI(2001), pp. 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39056-2_25Google Scholar
Vattam, S. S., Helms, M. E. and Goel, A. K. (2008), “Compound Analogical Design: Interaction between Problem Decomposition and Analogical Transfer in Biologically Inspired Design”, Design Computing and Cognition ‘08, pp. 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_20Google Scholar
Vincent, J. F. V. et al. (2006), “Biomimetics: its practice and theory”, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, Vol. 3 No. 9, pp. 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0127Google Scholar
Wanieck, K. et al. (2017), “Biomimetics and its tools”, Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbibn.16.00010Google Scholar
Wolff, J. O. et al. (2017), “Clarity of objectives and working principles enhances the success of biomimetic programs”, Bioinspiration and Biomimetics. IOP Publishing, Vol. 12 No. 5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa86ffGoogle Scholar