Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:38:29.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Research through Design Framework from the Evaluation of a Meta-Design Platform for Open and Collaborative Design and Making Processes

Part of: Collaborative Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Massimo Menichinelli
Massimo Menichinelli*
Affiliation:
Aalto University - School of Arts, Design and Architecture - Department of Media - Media Lab Helsinki; RMIT University
*
Contact: Menichinelli, Massimo Aalto University, School of Arts, Design and Architecture - Department of Media - Media Lab Helsinki Finland, massimo.menichinelli@aalto.fi

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The democratisation of technologies, knowledge and activities have been changing the world of designers, blurring the boundaries between amateur and professional designers, especially within the connected phenomena of the Maker Movement and Indie Designers. Within this context, how can be collaborative design processes documented, analysed, managed, shared? This article investigates the role of meta-design digital tools for the facilitation of distributed systems of creative agents, formally trained and informal amateurs that collaboratively design and produce artefacts. It documents a research study organised for testing a digital meta-design platform with users and the researcher as meta-designer: the results provide insights for improving the platform but also for building a comprehensive research through design framework that connects meta-design research and practice for exploring the role and nature of meta-design and meta-designers in facilitating collaborative design processes starting from their description with digital ontologies.

Keywords

Platform strategiesResearch methodologies and methodsCollaborative design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 21 - 30
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Ahrne, G. and Brunsson, N. (2005), “Organizations and meta-organizations”, Scand. J. Manag., Organizations: Past, Present and Future, Vol. 21, pp. 429–449. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2005.09.005Google Scholar
Anderson, C. (2012), Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Crown Business, New York.Google Scholar
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H. and Moedas, C. (2018), “Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies”, Calif. Manage. Rev., Vol. 60, pp. 5–16. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2006), Designerly Ways of Knowing, 1st ed. Springer-Verlag, London.Google Scholar
Duffy, A.H.B. (2002), “Designing design”, 29 Proc. EDIProD 2002 Zielona Góra Pol. 10-1210 2002, pp. 37–46.Google Scholar
Ehn, P. (2008), “Participation in design things”, Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, PDC’08. Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA, pp. 92–101.Google Scholar
Fischer, G. and Scharff, E. (2000), “Meta-design: design for designers”, Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. pp. 396–405.Google Scholar
Gerritzen, M. and Lovink, G. (2010), Everyone is a Designer In the Age of Social Media, 1 edition. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gershenfeld, N. (2005), FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop–From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Giaccardi, E. (2003), “Principles of Metadesign: Processes and Levels of Co-Creation in the New Design Space” (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Plymouth, Plymouth.Google Scholar
Green, S., Southee, D. and Boult, J. (2014), “Towards a Design Process Ontology”, Des. J., Vol. 17, pp. 515–537. https://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175630614X14056185480032Google Scholar
LimeSurvey Project Team and Schmitz, C. (2015), LimeSurvey: An Open Source survey tool. LimeSurvey Project Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Manzini, E. (2015), Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Menichinelli, M. (2019a), “openp2pdesign/OpenMetaDesign: v1.1 Secure MongoDB implemented in Docker Compose”, Zenodo. https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2530360Google Scholar
Menichinelli, M. (2019b), “openp2pdesign/OpenMetaDesign: v1.0: Version tested with users on 16/10/2018”, Zenodo. https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2597616Google Scholar
Menichinelli, M. (2019c), “openp2pdesign/OpenMetaDesignResearchStudy: v1.0: first complete version of questionnaire and notebook files, with .png and .svg files and two .csv files”, Zenodo. https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2530744Google Scholar
Menichinelli, M. (2018a), “Service design and activity theory for the meta-design of collaborative design processes”, ServDes2018. Service Design Proof of Concept, Proceedings of the ServDes.2018 Conference, 18–20 June, Milano, Italy. Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, Sweden, pp. 994–1008.Google Scholar
Menichinelli, M. (2018b), “A shared data format for describing collaborative design processes”, Cumulus Conference Proceedings Paris 2018 – To Get There: Designing Together. Presented at the Cumulus Paris 2018, Cumulus, pp. 190–215.Google Scholar
Menichinelli, M. and Valsecchi, F. (2016), “The meta-design of systems: how design, data and software enable the organizing of open, distributed, and collaborative processes”, in: 6th IFDP - Systems & Design: Beyond Processes and Thinking. Presented at the 6th International Forum of Design as a Process Systems & Design: Beyond Processes and Thinking, Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, pp. 518–537. https://dx.doi.org/10.4995/IFDP.2016.3301Google Scholar
openp2pdesign (2018), “openp2pdesign/OpenMetaDesign: v1.0: Version tested with users on 16/10/2018 [WWW Document]”. URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KjYdSMo4lU (accessed 3.19.19).Google Scholar
Redström, J. (2017), Making Design Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Sim, S.K. and Duffy, A.H.B. (2003), “Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities”, Res. Eng. Des., Vol. 14, pp. 200–223. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-003-0037-1Google Scholar