Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:50:45.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When Design Never Ends - A Future Scenario for Product Developement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One of the foundations of product design is the division between production and design. This division manifests as designers aspiring to create fixed iconic archetypes and production replicates endlessly in thousands or millions. Today innovation and technological change are challenging this idea of product design and manufacturing. The evolution of Rapid Prototyping into Additive Manufacturing (AM), is challenging the notion of mass manufacture and consumer value. As AM advances in capability and capacity, the ability to economically manufacture products in low numbers with high degrees of personalisation poses questions of the accepted product development process. Removing the need for dedicated expensive tooling also eliminates the cyclical timescales and commitment to fixed designs that investment in tooling demands. The ability to alter designs arbitrarily, frequently and responsively means that the traditional design process need not be applied and because of this, design processes and practice might be radically different in the future. In this paper, we explore this possible evolution by drawing parallels with principles and development models found in software development.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Adidas. (2017), “Adidas Knit for you”, Available at: http://adidasknitforyou.com/ [Accessed November 27, 2018].Google Scholar
Anderson, C. (2009), The Longer Long Tail : How Endless Choice is Creating Unlimited Demand, “Random House Business”.Google Scholar
Ardito, C., Lanzilotti, R., … P.M.-P. of and 2009, U. (2009), “Redefining the roles of users and designers in interactive system lifecycle”, In Proceedings of CHItaly.Google Scholar
Autodesk. “An Agile Approach to Product Development | Autodesk”, Available at: https://www.autodesk.com/industry/manufacturing/resources/mechanical-engineer/agile-product-development [Accessed March 21, 2019].Google Scholar
Barrett, A.K. (2018), “Technological appropriations as workarounds”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 368387.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2000), Liquid Modernity, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, K., Beedle, M., Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M. and Grenning, J. et al. (2001), “Manifesto for Agile Software Development”, The Agile Alliance, Vol. 2009 No. December 14, p. 2006.Google Scholar
Bell, T.E. and Thayer, T.A. (1976), “Software Requirements: Are They Really a Problem?” In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Software engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press. pp. 6168.Google Scholar
Boehm, B. and , B. (1986), “A spiral model of software development and enhancement”, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 2242.Google Scholar
Bye, E., LaBat, K., McKinney, E. and Kim, D. (2008), “Optimized pattern grading”, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp.7992.Google Scholar
Campbell, R.I., De Beer, D.J. and Booysen, G. (2007), “Rapid tooling strategies for product customisation and design evolution”, Journal for New Generation Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Constantinides, E. and Fountain, S.J. (2008), “Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues”, Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, Vol. 9 No. 3 pp. 231244.Google Scholar
Córdoba Rubino, S., Hazenberg, W. and Huisman, M. (2011), Meta Products : Meaningful Design for our Connected World. BIS Publishers.Google Scholar
Dieter, G. and Schmidt, L. (2012), Engineering Design. New York, McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Eastman, R.M. (1980), “Engineering information release prior to final design freeze”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 3742.Google Scholar
Fischer, G. and Giaccardi, E. (2006), “Meta-design: a framework for the future of end-user development”, End User Development: pp. 427457.Google Scholar
Forsberg, K. and Mooz, H. (1991), “The relationship of system engineering to the project cycle”, INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 1 No. 1 pp. 5765.Google Scholar
Franke, N., Keinz, P. and Steger, C.J. (2009), “Testing the value of customization: when do customers really prefer products tailored to their preferences?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73 No. 5, pp. 103121.Google Scholar
Gillette. (2018), “Razor Maker”, Available at: https://razor-maker.com/ [Accessed November 27, 2018].Google Scholar
Hatch, P. (2016), “The Macintosh Moment – How UX and Design Thinking help you find it - Bosch ConnectedWorld Blog”, Bosh ConnectedWorld Blog. Available at: https://blog.bosch-si.com/internetofthings/macintosh-moment-ux-design-thinking-help-find/ [Accessed December 5, 2018].Google Scholar
Heskett, J. (2003), Industrial Design, Thames & Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Knight, T. and Stiny, G. (2001), “Classical and non-classical computation”, Information Technology, Vol. 5 No. 4.Google Scholar
Kudus, S.I.A., Campbell, R.I. and Bibb, R.J. (2016a), “Customer perceived value for self-designed personalised products made using additive manufacturing”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM), Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 183193.Google Scholar
Kudus, S.I.A., Campbell, R.I., Bibb, R.J., Abdul Kudus, S.I., Campbell, R.I. and Bibb, R.J. (2016b), “Assessing the value of 3D printed personalised products”, In 7th International Conference on Mass Customization and Personalization in Central Europe (MCP-CE 2016). Novi Sad, pp. 110.Google Scholar
Kumke, M., Watschke, H., Hartogh, P., Bavendiek, A.-K. and Vietor, T. (2018), “Methods and tools for identifying and leveraging additive manufacturing design potentials”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 481493.Google Scholar
Kurch-Lucas, E. (2018), “Industrial design in the age of IoT - Bosch ConnectedWorld Blog”, Bosh ConnectedWorld Blog. Available at: https://blog.bosch-si.com/internetofthings/industrial-design-in-the-age-of-iot/ [Accessed December 5, 2018].Google Scholar
Lucy, Handley. (2018), “Procter & Gamble is testing 3D printed Gillette razors”, CNBC. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/18/procter--gamble-is-testing-3d-printed-gillette-razors.html [Accessed November 27, 2018].Google Scholar
Moogk, D.R. (2012), “Minimum viable product and the importance of experimentation in technology startups”, Technology Innovation Management Review, (March), pp. 2326.Google Scholar
Murray-Nag, B. (2017), “adidas pop-up store knits bespoke garments based on a scan of your body”, Designboom. Available at: https://www.designboom.com/technology/adidas-knit-for-you-03-22-2017/ [Accessed November 27, 2018].Google Scholar
Nichetto, L. (2018), “Alphabeta Pendant Lamp Configurator – Hem”, Available at: https://www.hem.com/products/alphabeta-configurator [Accessed December 3, 2018].Google Scholar
O'Reilly, T. (2005), “What Is Web 2.0 - O'Reilly Media”, Available at: https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html [Accessed December 4, 2018].Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H.H. (2007), Engineering Design. 3rd ed., Springer, London.Google Scholar
Paterson, A. (2013), Digitisation of the Splinting Process: Exploration and Evaluation of a Computer Aided Design Approach to Support Additive Manufacture, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
Paterson, A.M., Donnison, E., Bibb, R.J. and Ian Campbell, R. (2014), “Computer-aided design to support fabrication of wrist splints using 3D printing: A feasibility study”, Hand Therapy, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 102113.Google Scholar
Pradel, P., Zhu, Z., Bibb, R.J. and Moultrie, J. (2018), “Investigation of design for additive manufacturing in professional design practice”, Journal of Engineering Design.Google Scholar
Pressman, R.S. (2010), Software Engineering : A Practitioner's Approach, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston.Google Scholar
Ralph, P. (2018), “The two paradigms of software development research”, Science of Computer Programming, Vol. 156, pp. 6889.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, L. and Liliana, . (2017), “Technology Appropriation Awareness and Identification”.Google Scholar
Römer, A., Pache, M., Weißhahn, G., Lindemann, U. and Hacker, W. (2001), “Effort-saving product representations in design—results of a questionnaire survey”, Design Studies, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 473491.Google Scholar
Sandhelden, . (2018), “Sandhelden | Individuelle Waschbecken”, Available at: http://www.sandhelden.de/ [Accessed November 27, 2018].Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. (2012a), The Specification of a Consumer Design Toolkit to Support Personalised Production Via Additive Manufacturing. Loughborough University.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. (2012b), The Specification of a Consumer Design Toolkit to Support Personalised Production Via Additive Manufacturing. © Matthew Sinclair.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. (2017), “What will designers do when everyone can be a designer?” In Design for Personalisation. p. 91.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. and Campbell, I. (2014), “A Classification of Consumer Involvement in New Product Development”, Proceedings of DRS 2014: Design's Big Debates.: pp. 15821598.Google Scholar
Thompson, M.K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R.I., Gibson, I. and Bernard, A. et al. (2016), “Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 65 No. 2 pp. 737760.Google Scholar
Grimm, T. (1998), “The human condition: a justification for rapid prototyping”, Time-Compression Technologies, Vol. 3 No. 3.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2012), Product Design and Development. 2nd ed. Milano, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vesanen, J. (2007), “What is personalization? A conceptual framework”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41 No. 5/6, pp. 409418.Google Scholar
Yavari, H., Kudus, S.I.A. and Campbell, R.I. (2016), “User involvement in design: a case study of using an AM-enabled mass customisation and personalisation (MC&P) toolkit”, In Proceedings of 2015 14th Rapid Design, Prototyping and Manufacture conference (RDPM 14). pp. 1516.Google Scholar