Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:47:05.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The class number one problem for some non-abeliannormal CM-fields of 2-power degrees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 1998

S Louboutin
Affiliation:
Département de Mathématiques, Université de Caen, UFR Sciences, 14032 Caen cedex, France. E-mail: loubouti@math.unicaen.fr
R Okazaki
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Doshisha University, Tanabe, Kyoto 610-03, Japan. E-mail: rokazaki@mail.doshisha.ac.jp
Get access

Abstract

First, we prove that a non-abelian normal CM-field of degree 16 has odd relative class number if and only if it is dihedral, or is a compositum of two normal octic CM-fields with the same maximal real subfield, or has Galois group $G_9 =\langle a,b,z: a^2=b^2=z^4=1,b^{-1}ab=az^2,az=za,bz=zb\rangle$. Then, we solve several relative class number one problems. (1) We solve the relative class number one problem for the dihedral CM-fields of 2-power degrees. First, we remind the reader of the characterization of the dihedral CM-fields of 2-power degrees with odd relative class numbers. Second, we give lower bounds on relative class numbers of dihedral CM-fields of 2-power degrees with odd relative class numbers. We thus obtain an upper bound on the discriminants of the dihedral CM-fields of 2-power degrees with relative class number equal to 1. Third, we compute the relative class numbers of all the dihedral CM-fields of 2-power degrees with odd relative class numbers and discriminants less than or equal to this latter bound. We end up with a list of twenty-four dihedral CM-fields of 2-power degrees with relativeclass numbers equal to 1, and show that exactly twenty-one of them have class number 1. (2) We determine all the non-abelian normal CM-fields of degree 16 with Galois group $G_9$ which have relative class number 1 (there is only one such number field), and then those which have class number 1 (there is only one such number field). (3) We determine some of the non-abelian normal CM-fields $N =N_1N_2$ of degree 16 which are composita of two normal octic CM-fields $N_1$ and $N_2$ with the same maximal real subfield which have relative class number 1, and then those which have class number 1. Indeed, we focus on the case where one of the $N_i$ is a quaternion octic CM-field and prove that there is only one such compositum with relative class number 1 and that this compositum has class number 1.

1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: primary 11R29; secondary 11R21, 11R42, 11M20, 11Y40.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
London Mathematical Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)