Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:46:16.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Køkkenmøddinger’ (Shell Middens) in Denmark: a Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Søren H. Andersen
Søren H. Andersen
Affiliation:
National Museum of Denmark, Centre for Maritime Archaeology, Roskilde, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a review of prehistoric shell midden sites (‘Køkkenmøddinger’) in Denmark. The form and structure of these sites, their contents, distributions, cultural associations, and chronology are discussed. It is concluded that they are not a unique type of coastal settlement but represent coastal, homebase settlements characterised by a dominance of shellfish in the cultural deposits. This is the only aspect by which they differ from the rest of the coastal habitation system. Shell midden sites seem to flourish in periods characterised by a rich marine biotope and coastal habitation can be seen as a direct reflection of variations/changes in the marine biotope.

Résumé

Cette étude présente une révision des sites préhistoriques à amas coquilliers (‘Køkkenmødinger’) au Danemark. On y examine la forme et la structure de ces sites, leur contenu, leur répartition, leurs associations culturelles et leur chronologie. On en conclut qu'ils ne constituent pas un type singulier d'occupation côtière, mais représentent des occupations côtières, sédentaires caractérisées par la prédominance de coquillages dans les dépôts culturels. C'est le seul aspect qui les distingue du reste du système d'habitations côtières. Les sites à amas coquilliers semblent prospérer dans les périodes caractérisées par un riche biotope marin et on peut considérer l'habitat côtier comme un reflet direct des variations/ changements dans le biotope marin.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel stellt eine Besprechung der prähistorischen Muschelhaufen Fundstellen (‘Køkkenmøddinger’) in Dänemark dar. Die Form und Struktur dieser Fundstellen, ihr Inhalt, Verbreitung, kulturelle Zugehörigkeit und Chronologie werden diskutiert. Es wird zusammengefaßt, daß es sich dabei nicht um einen einmaligen Typ einer Küstensiedlung handelt, sondern lediglich um stationäre Küstensiedlungen, die sich durch ein Vorherrschen von Schalentieren und kulturellen Ablagerungen charakterisieren. Dies ist ihre einziges Unterscheidungskriterium im Küstenbesiedlungssystem. Muschenhaufenfundstellen scheinen in Zeiten eine Blühte erlebt zu haben, die durch reiche maritime Biotope gekennzeichnet sind. Die Küstenbesiedlung kann als eine direkte Widerspiegelung der Variationen/Veränderungen in den maritimen Biotopen gesehen werden.

Resúmen

Este trabajo presenta una reseña de los concheros prehistóricos (“Køkkenmøddiger”) en Dinamarca. Se discute la forma y estructura de estos depósitos, sus contenidos, distribuciones, asociaciones culturales y cronología. Se concluye que no son un tipo único de asentamiento costero, sino que representan asentamientos base en el litoral caracterizados por un predominio de moluscos en los depósitos culturales. Este es el único aspecto que los diferencia de otros asentamientos costeros. Los concheros parecen florecer en periodos caracterizados por ricos biotopos marinos y el asentamiento costero puede ser entendido como un reflejo directo de variaciones/cambios en el biotopo marino.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 66 , 2000 , pp. 361 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Andersen, H.H. 1961. Køkkenmøddingen ved Mejlgård. Kuml 1960, 26–35Google Scholar
Andersen, S.H. 1979. Aggersund. En Ertebølleboplads ved Limfjorden. (Aggersund. An Ertebølle Settlement on the Limfjord). Kuml 1978, 7–56Google Scholar
Andersen, S.H. 1991. Norsminde. A ‘køkkenmødding’ with Late Mesolithic and Early Neolithic occupation. Journal of Danish Archaeology 8, 13–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S.H. 1992. Marin udnyttelse af Limfjorden i stenalderen. In Limfjordsprojektet. Rapport nr. 4: Limfjordsfiskeri i fortid og nutid, 65–96Google Scholar
Andersen, S.H. 1993. Bjørnsholm. A stratified køkkenmødding on the central Limfjord, north Jutland. Journal of Danish Archaeology 10, 59–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S.H. 1995. Coastal adaption and marine exploitation in Late Mesolithic Denmark – with special emphasis on the Limfjord region. In Fischer, A. (ed.), Man & Sea in the Mesolithic, 41–66. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 53Google Scholar
Andersen, S.H. & Johansen, E. 1987. Ertebølle revisited. Journal of Danish Archaeology 5, 31–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S.H. & Johansen, E. 1997. ‘Køkkenmødding – projektet’ – et nyt fredningstiltag. (‘The kitchen midden project’ – a new conservation measure). Arkæologiske udgravninger i Danmark 1996, 7–18Google Scholar
Andersen, et al. 1986. New radiocarbon dates for two Mesolithic burials in Denmark. In Gowlett, J.A.J. & Hedges, R. E. M. (eds), Archaeological Results from Accelerator Dating, 39–43. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 11Google Scholar
Arnaud, J.E. Morais. 1989. The Mesolithic communities of the Sado Valley, Portugal, in their ecological setting. In Bonsall, C. (ed.), The Mesolithic in Europe, 614–631. Edinburgh: John DonaldGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. 1983. In Pursuit of the Past. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bratlund, B. 1993. The bone remains of mammals and birds from the Bjørnsholm shell-mound. A preliminary report. Journal of Danish Archaeology 10, 97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, V. & Bourget, E. 1991. Analyses of shell increment and microgrowth band formation to establish seasonality of shellfish collection. Journal of Danish Archaeology 8, 7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enghoff, I.B. 1993. Mesolithic eel-fishing at Bjørnsholm, Denmark. Journal of Danish Archaeology 10, 105–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, H.S. 1982. Skaldyrssæson. Skalk. Nr. 3, 9–10Google Scholar
Kayser, O. 1986. Les amas coquilliers d'Armorique. Archeologia 218, 68–74Google Scholar
Klinge, M. 1931. Ny Forstaaelse af Kulturlagets og Ildstedernes Betydning i Stenalderens Affaldsdynger. Naturens Verden jan. 1931, 1 hftGoogle Scholar
Koike, H. 1986. Prehistoric hunting pressure and paleobiomass: an environmental reconstruction and archaeozoological analysis of a Jomon shellmound area. In Akazawa, T. & Aikens, C.M. (eds), Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers in Japan, 27–56Google Scholar
Madsen, A.P., Müller, S., Neergaard, C., Petersen, C.G.J., Rostrup, E., Steenstrup, K.J.V. & Winge, H. 1900. Affaldsdynger fra Stenalderen i Danmark. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Mathiassen, Th. 1919. Ertebøllekulturens Bopladser ved Roskilde Fjord. Aarbog udgivet af Historisk Samfund for Københavns Amt 1919, 7–25Google Scholar
Mathiassen, Th., Troels-Smith, J. & Degerbal, M. 1942. Dyrholmen. En Stenalderboplads paa Djursland. Det Kongelige Videnskabernes Selskab, Arkæologisk – Kunsthistoriske Skrifter Bd. 1,1. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Meehan, B. 1982. Shell Bed to Shell Midden. CanberraGoogle Scholar
Mellars, P. 1987. Excavations on Oronsay. Prehistoric Human Ecology on a Small Island. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Meøhl, U. 1979. Aggersund – bopladsen zoologisk belyst. Svanejagt som årsag til bosættelse? (Zoological analysis of the Aggersund settlement: a special-purpose camp for hunting swans?). Kuml 1978, 57–76Google Scholar
Pequart, M. & Pequart, S.-J. 1954. Hoedic. Deuxieme station – necropole du Mesolithique cotier armorican. AnversGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, S.A.S & Petersen, K.S. 1997. Djurslands geologi. GEUS. KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
Petersen, K.S. 1987. The Ertebølle køkkenmødding and the marine development of the Limfjord with special regard to the molluscan fauna. Journal of Danish Archaeology 5, 77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, L.Aa. & Petersen, K.S. 1980. Resultater fra DGU's genoptagne Kvartærgeologiske kortlægning. Dansk Geologisk Forenings Årsskrift for 1979, 47–54. KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
Roche, J. 1972. Le Gisement Mésolithique de Moita do Sebastao Muge. Portugal I. Archéologie. LisbonGoogle Scholar
Roche, J. 1983. Les origines de l'industrie de l'amas coquillier de Moita Do Sebastiao/Muge, Portugal. In. Kozlowski, J. (ed.), Les Changemants, Leurs Mécanismes, Leurs Causes dans la Culture du 7e au 6e Millénaire av. J-C. en Europe, 165–76. Archaeologia InterregionalisGoogle Scholar
Roche, J. 1989. Spatial organisation in the. Mesolithic sites of Muge, Portugal. In Bonsall, C. (ed.), The Mesolithic in Europe, 607–13. Edinburgh: John DonaldGoogle Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P. & Zvelebil, M. 1989. Saving it for later: Storage by prehistoric hunter-gatherers in Europe. In Halstead, P. & O'Shea, J. (eds), Bad Year Economics. Cultural Responses to Risk and Uncertainty, 40–56. Cambridge: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Th. & Jessen, A. 1906. Brabrand – Fundet fra den ældre Stenalder. Arkæologisk og geologisk behandlet. Aarb. f. nord. Oldk. og Hist. 1906, 1–74Google Scholar
Sorensen, S.A. 1995. Lollikhuse – a dwelling site under a kitchen midden. Journal of Danish Archaeology 11, 19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troels-Smith, J. 1995. Claudi-kiler, østersbanker og tidevand. In Hansen, H. & Aaby, B. (eds), Stavns Fjord – et natur og kulturhistorisk forskningsområde på Samsø, 59–67. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Andersen, S.H. 1970. Brovst. En kystboplads fra ældre stenalder. (Brovst). Kuml 1969, 67–90Google Scholar
Andersen, S.H. 1988. ‘Køkkenmøddinger’ – en truet fundgruppe. (‘Køkkemmøddinger’ – a threatened group of finds). Arkæologiske udgravninger i Danmark 1987, 28–43Google Scholar
Andersen, S.H. & Malmros, C. 1966. Norslund. En kystboplads fra ældre stenalder. (Norslund. A coastal Settlement from the Old Stone Age). Kuml 1965, 34–114Google Scholar
Bailey, G.N. 1978. Shell middens as indicators of postglacial economies: a territorial perspective. In Mellars, P. (ed.), The Early Postglacial Settlement of Northern Europe. An Ecological Perspective, 37–63. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Broholm, H.C. 1928. Langøfundet. En Boplads fra den ældre Stenalder paa Fyn. Med Bidrag af M. degerbøl og K. Jessen. Aarb. f. nord. Oldk. og Hist. 1928, 129–90Google Scholar
Coles, J.M. 1971. The early settlement of Scotland: excavations at Morton, Fife. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 37(2), 284–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enghoff, I.B. 1987. Freshwater fishing from a sea-coast settlement – the Ertebølle locus classicus revisited. Journal of Danish Archaeology 5, 62–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enghoff, I.B. 1991. Fishing from the stone age settlement Norsminde. Journal of Danish Archaeology 8, 41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, O. 1984. Autour du Mésolithique en Bretagne. Revue Archéologique Ouest 1, 7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, A.P. 1888. Undersøgelse af Kjøkkenmøddingen ved Meilgaard i 1888. Aarb. f. nord. Oldk. og Hist. 1888, 299–309Google Scholar
Petersen, C.G. johs. 1922. Om Tidsbestemmelse og Ernæringsforbold i den ældre Stenalder i Danmark. En biologisk Studie. Det Kgl. danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Biologiske Medd. 3, 9, 1–20. KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P. 1983. Sedentary hunters: the Ertebølle example. In Bailey, G. (ed.), Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Prehistory, 110–26. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Stein, J.K. (ed.). 1992. Deciphering a Shell Midden. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar