Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:09:57.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Quaternary Deposits at Hoxne, Suffolk, and their Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

R. G. West  and
C. M. B. McBurney
R. G. West
Affiliation:
Sub-department of Quaternary Research, University of Cambridge
C. M. B. McBurney
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The long history of investigations at Hoxne, Suffolk, beginning when John Frere discovered Palaeolithic implements there in the last decade of the eighteenth century, has been described by Moir. Moir himself worked on the deposits at Hoxne, and the results of his investigations, together with those of Reid, have formed the basis for our knowledge of the geology and archaeology of the deposits. From these investigations it is clear that Hoxne is an important site, for it is one of the rare places where there are interglacial lake deposits and Palaeolithic implements in direct association with ground moraines of the older glaciations. Moreover, the deposits occupy a well-known position in the East Anglian Quaternary succession.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , December 1955 , pp. 131 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 131 note 1 Frere, J., Archaeologia, vol. XIII (1800), p. 204CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 131 note 2 Moir, J. R., Proc. Prehist. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. V (1926), p. 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 131 note 3 Moir, J. R., Bull. Amer. Sch. Prehist. Res., no. 11 (1935), p. 43Google Scholar.

page 131 note 4 Reid, C., Rep. Brit. Assoc. for 1896, p. 400Google Scholar.

page 131 note 5 West, R. G., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B. In the press.

page 131 note 6 ibid.

page 133 note 1 West, R. G. and Donner, J. J., Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. In the press.

page 134 note 1 West, R. G. and Donner, J. J., Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. In the press.

page 135 note 1 Moir, J. R., Proc Prehist. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. V (1926), p. 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 137 note 1 Frere, J., op. cit.

page 137 note 2 Prestwich, J., Phil. Trans., vol. CL (1860), p. 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 137 note 3 Reid, C., op. cit.

page 137 note 4 Moir, J. R., Proc. Prehist. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. V (1926), p. 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 137 note 5 Moir, J. R., Bull Amer. Sch. Prehist. Res., no. 11 (1935), p. 43Google Scholar.

page 139 note 1 Woldstedt, P., Geol. Jber., vol. LXV (1950), p. 621Google Scholar.

page 139 note 2 Pike, K. and Godwin, H., Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. CVIII (1952), p. 261CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 141 note 1 Following the suggestion of the Abb6 Breuil, this industry has long been regarded as a sort of final Clactonian, despite the presence of excellent hand-axes—a view challenged below.

page 149 note 1 Proc. Prehist. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. V (1926)Google Scholar, figs. 9 a–c.

page 149 note 2 ibid., fig. 12.

page 149 note 3 Bordes, F. and Fitte, P., ‘L'atelier Commont,’ L'Anthropologie, Tome 57 (1953), p. 1Google Scholar.

page 151 note 1 Gravels below Older Loess.

page 151 note 2 Commont's workshop site in gravels below Older Loess.