Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:47:45.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—The Effect of Concentration on the Terminal Fall Velocity of Particles in Suspension*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

Hugh Rankin Thorpe
Hugh Rankin Thorpe
Affiliation:
formerly Research Student, University of Aberdeen.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The paper describes an investigation of the terminal velocity of uniformly dispersed particles of various shapes, sizes and densities falling through water.

It is concluded that for concentrations above 0–5 per cent by weight, the suspension as a whole behaves as though it were viscous even though the individual particles lie well outside the Stokes range. The shape of the particles has a significant effect only when the concentration is less than 0·5 per cent, and for concentrations between 0·5 and 7·0 per cent, the relative changes in velocity of descent are adequately described for a range of particle shapes from highly angular to spherical and for sizes at least up to 0·65 mm. nominal diameter, by the power series

in which U is the velocity of the suspension, U0 that of a single particle, d the nominal diameter (i.e. that of a sphere having the same volume) and s the mean spacing of the particles.

If the concentration is lower than 4 per cent, the equation may be assumed linear in (d/s) without serious error.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , 1965 , pp. 9 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Burgers, J. M., 1942 “On the Influence of the Concentration of a Suspension upon the Sedimentation Velocity (in particular for a Suspension of Spherical Particles)”, Proc. Acad. Sci. Amst., 44, 1045, 1177; 45, 9, 126.Google Scholar
Cunningham, E., 1910 “On the Velocity of Steady Fall of Particles through a Fluid Medium”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 83, 357–365.Google Scholar
Hawksley, P. G. W., 1951 “The Effect of Concentration on the Settling of Suspensions and Flow through Porous Media’: (In “Some Aspects of Fluid Flow”, 144.) London: Arnold and Co.Google Scholar
Howe, J. W., 1951 “Flow Measurement”. (Ch. III of “Engineering Hydraulics”, by H. Rouse, 191.) Wiley.Google Scholar
Krumbein, W. C., 1942 “Settling-velocity and Flume-behavior of Non-spherical Particles”, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 1942, 621–633.Google Scholar
Krumbein, W. C., 1943 “Fundamental Attributes of Sedimentary Particles”, Proc. 2nd Hydraul. Conf., Univ. la. Stud. Engng., Bull., 27, 318–331.Google Scholar
Lamb, H., 1911 “On the Uniform Motion of a Sphere Through a Viscous Fluid”, Phil. Mag., 21, p. 112.Google Scholar
Lamb, H., 1945 “Hydrodynamics”, 608–614. Dover.Google Scholar
Lin, Pin-Nam, 1951 “Effect of Spacing and Size Distribution on the Fall Velocity of Sediment”. Ph.D. dissertation, Dep. Mech. and Hydraul. St. Univ. la.Google Scholar
McNown, J. S., 1951 “Particles in Slow Motion”, Houille Blanche, 1951, 701–722.Google Scholar
McNown, J. S., Lee, H. M., McPherson, M. B., and Engez, S. M., 1948 “Influence of Boundary Proximity upon the Drag of Spheres”, Proc. 7th Int. Congr. Appi. Mech., Lond., 17–29.Google Scholar
McNown, J. S., and Lin, Pin-Nam, 1952 “Sediment Concentration and Fall Velocity”, Proc. 2nd Mid-Western Conf. Fluid Mech., Ohio St. Univ., 401–411.Google Scholar
McNown, J. S., and Malaika, Jamil, 1950 “Effects of Particle Shape upon Settling Velocities at Low Reynolds' Numbers”, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 31, 74–81.Google Scholar
Maude, A. D., and Whitmore, R. L., 1958 “A Generalized Theory of Sedimentation”, Brit. J. Appi. Phys., 9, 477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. F., and Zaki, W. N., 1954 “Sedimentation and Fluidisation”, Trans. Instn. Chem. Engrs., 32, 35.Google Scholar
Smoluchowski, M. S., 1913 “On the Practical Applicability of Stokes Law of Resistance and the Modifications of it required in Certain Cases”, Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Math., 192–201.Google Scholar
Thorpe, H. R., 1960 “A Study of the Transportation of Suspended Sediment by Turbulent Water Flows”. M.E. thesis, Univ. of Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Thorpe, H. R., 1963 “Experiments on a Scale Model of a Siphon Spillway and the Effect of Concentration upon the Fall Velocity of Particles in a Suspension”. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Aberdeen.Google Scholar