No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 February 2012
In a recent paper in these Proceedings, Dr G. C. McVittie has published some criticisms of kinematical relativity. These criticisms are to a large extent based on his formula (4.10), namely,
It must be stated at the outset that McVittie's interpretation of his derivation of (1) as a derivation of “Milne's formula for the acceleration of a ‘free particle moving in the presence of a substratum,’ for the special case of one spatial co-ordinate only” is wrong. McVittie does not derive the result, as he claims, from what he calls the “axioms of kinematical relativity” alone; he deduces it from these axioms together with an additional assumption, which is equivalent to begging the answer to the whole problem it was my object to solve. Instead of considering a free particle, as I did—that is, a particle whose motion we do not a priori know—he prescribes a priori the motion of his particle as being constrained to obey the rule, in his notation,
page 288 note * Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., A, vol. lxi, part iii, 1942, no. 17, pp. 210–222.Google Scholar
page 288 note † Quart. Journ. Math. (Oxford), vol. viii, 1937, p. 22.Google Scholar
page 288 note ‡ Proc. Roy. Soc, A, vol. clix, 1937, p. 186.Google Scholar
page 292 note * The details have been given in another connection in the author's paper “The Inverse Square Law of Gravitation, I,” Proc. Roy. Soc, vol. clvi, A, 1936, p. 70Google Scholar.
page 293 note * This is used in deducing β= - aZ2/XY.
page 293 note † Zeits. für Astrophys., vol. vi, 1.95, 1933.Google Scholar
page 293 note ‡ The equations (6), (7) above satisfy the hydrodynamical equation of continuity.
page 293 note § Quart. Journ. Math. (Oxford), vol. viii, 1937, pp. 22–31.Google Scholar
page 294 note * , Whitrow, Quart. Journ. Math. (Oxford), vol. iv, 1933, pp. 161–172.Google Scholar
page 294 note † , Whitrow, “On equivalent observers,” Quart. Journ. Math. (Oxford), vol. vi, 1935, pp. 249–260.Google Scholar
page 294 note ‡ , Milne and , Whitrow, “On the meaning of uniform time, etc.,” Zeits. fiir Astrophys., vol. xv, 1938, pp. 263–298.Google Scholar
page 297 note * Journ. London Math. Soc, vol. xv, 1940, p. 58.Google Scholar
page 297 note † Proc. Roy. Soc, vol. clix, A, 1937, pp. 180–181.Google Scholar