Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:40:17.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I.—The Adventures of an Hypothesis*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

Extract

In the year 1815 an anonymous article appeared in Thomas Thomson's Annals of Philosophy (I) entitled “On the Relation between the Specific Gravities of Bodies in their Gaseous State and the Weights of their Atoms ”. Its introductory paragraph illustrates the hesitancy of the writer in its exposition: “The author of the following essay submits it to the public with the greatest diffidence; for although he has taken the utmost pains to arrive at the truth, yet he has not that confidence in his abilities as an experimentalist as to induce him to dictate to others far superior to himself in chemical acquirements and fame. He trusts, however, that its importance will be seen, and that some one will undertake to examine it, and thus verify or refute its conclusions. If these should be proved erroneous, still new facts may be brought to light, or old ones better established, by the investigation; but if they should be verified, a new and interesting light will be thrown upon the whole science of chemistry.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

(1) [Prout], 1815. Annals of Philosophy, VI, 321330.Google Scholar
(2)Dalton, , 1810. New System of Chemical Philosophy, Part II, 377.Google Scholar
(3)Thomson, , 1816. Annals of Philosophy, VII, 17.Google Scholar
(4) [Prout], 1816. Annals of Philosophy, VII, 111113.Google Scholar
(5)Thomson, , 1816. Annals of Philosophy, VII, 343.Google Scholar
(6)Turner, , 1833. Phil. Trans., CXXIII, 523544.Google Scholar
(7)Penny, , 1839. Phil. Trans., CXXIX, 1333.Google Scholar
(8)Dumas, and Stas, , 1841. Ann. Chim. phys. [3], 1, 538.Google Scholar
(9)Dumas, , 1843. Ann. chim. phys. [3], VIII, 189207.Google Scholar
(10)Marignac, , 1842. C.R., XIV, 570573.Google Scholar
(11)Marignac, , 1843. Bibl. Univ., XLVI, 350377.Google Scholar
(12)Daubeny, , 1831. Introduction to the Atomic Theory, 129130.Google Scholar
(13)Dumas, , 1859. Ann. chim. phys. [3], LV, 129210.Google Scholar
(14)Stas, , 1860. Bull. Acad. Roy. Belg. [2], x, 208336.Google Scholar
(15)Kendall, , 1949. Chemistry and Industry (Baekeland Memorial Lecture), XXVII, 6770.Google Scholar
(16)Marignac, , 1860. Bibl. Univ., IX, 97107.Google Scholar
(17)Cockroft, and Walton, , 1932. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A, LXXXVI, 619.Google Scholar
(18)Bethe, , 1939. Phys. Rev., LV, 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Haldane, , 1949. Philosophy for the Future, The Macmillan Company, 204.Google Scholar
(20)Muller, , 1927. Science, LXVI, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(21)Auerbach, and Robson, , 1947. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B, LXII, 271, 284, 307.Google Scholar
(22) [Dobbin], 1932. Alembic Club Reprint, No. 20 (E. & S. Livingstone, Edinburgh), 5.Google Scholar