No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2015
In this communication the author referred to the various theories advanced to account for the boring of the Pholadidæ in rocks.
The first hypothesis, which supposes that the molluscs perforate by means of the rotation of the valves acting as augers, he disproved by exhibiting old individuals of the Pholus crispata with the dentated costæ as sharp as in any young specimen. That these animals bore by silicious particles secreted by the foot, as suggested by Mr Hancock, has been disproved by microscopic observation; and that currents of water set in motion by vibratile cilia, seemed also insufficient to account for the phenomenon.