Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T09:39:50.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X.—A Method of Measuring Mental Processes in Normal and Insane People, with special reference to Maniac Depressive Insanity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

George Rutherford Jeffrey
George Rutherford Jeffrey
Affiliation:
Crichton Royal Institution, Dumfries and District Asylum, Ayr
Get access

Extract

Among the problems which confront the psychiatrist in arriving at a judgment upon a mental case, few are more difficult than the estimation of the patient's mental working capacity. A rough approximation may be attained by careful observation of the patient's daily reaction to his surroundings—by the attitude he adopts to the little problems of his daily life; but such is, at best, only a very vague and unsatisfactory measure. To impose simple tasks for the purpose of obtaining objective criteria upon which to base our judgment is unusually difficult, and patients who were incapable of comprehending the new task would have to be excluded from its action; and to interest the patients in such a task sufficiently to persuade them to do their best is often not possible. The estimation of the working capacity of a large proportion of patients would thus seem at first sight to be beyond our powers to ascertain.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 32 , 1913 , pp. 73 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Maloney, , “On the Reckoning Test and its Uses in Psychiatry,” Review of Neur. and Psych., vol. ix., No. 7, p. 366.Google Scholar
2.Maloney, , Instructions in the Use of the Reckoning Test.Google Scholar
3.Kraepelin, and others, quoted by Maloney, , Review of Neur. and Psych., vol. ix., No. 7.Google Scholar
4. “Ueber die Wirkung kurzer Arbeit's Zeiten,” quoted by Wimms, J. H., “Fatigue and Practice,” Brit. Jour. Psychol., vol. ii. p. 153et seq., 1907–1908.Google Scholar
5.Amberg, Kraepelin's Psych. Arbeiten, Band i., Seite 336, quoted by Maloney, , Review of Neur. and Psych., vol. ix., No. 7.Google Scholar
6.Maloney, , Psych. Arbeiten, Band i., Seite 336, quoted by Maloney, , Review of Neur. and Psych., vol. ix., No. 7.Google Scholar