Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T09:39:12.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thursday, 1st February, 1912

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2010

Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London , Volume 24 , June 1912 , pp. 78 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 80 note 1 Proceedings, xxiii. 283.

page 82 note 1 Archaeologia, lxii, pt. i, pp. 333 ff.

page 88 note 1 Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., xxxviii. 48, and fig. 21.

page 88 note 2 Another possible explanation is that the tumulus was at one time planted with trees, whose roots may have been instrumental in depositing the sherds at the places of discovery.

page 93 note 1 On the map (fig. 1) the position of deep ditches, still existent, or belts of trees, now destroyed, has been designated by crosses x x x x. These may have had some connexion witli Abbot Godfrey's enclosure. It will be seen that they extend northward almost to an accommodation road known as Rumphrey's Balk. In this name undoubtedly may be seen a survival of that mentioned by William of Whittlesey, in his account of Abbot Godfrey's activities in the second year of his rule, where it is recorded that he made. ‘apud Rumpele prope Eyebiri cuniculare novum de sumptibus IX sol. VII den.’