Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:14:26.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Domain exchange experiments in duck δ-crystallins: Functional and evolutionary implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1999

LILIANA M. SAMPALEANU
Affiliation:
Structural Biology and Biochemistry, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
ALAN R. DAVIDSON
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
CAROLINE GRAHAM
Affiliation:
Section on Molecular Structure and Function, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2740
GRAEME J. WISTOW
Affiliation:
Section on Molecular Structure and Function, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2740
P. LYNNE HOWELL
Affiliation:
Structural Biology and Biochemistry, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
Get access

Abstract

δ-Crystallin, the major soluble protein component of the avian and reptilian eye lens, is homologous to the urea cycle enzyme argininosuccinate lyase (ASL). In duck lenses there are two δ crystallins, denoted δ1 and δ2. Duck δ2 is both a major structural protein of the lens and also the duck orthologue of ASL, an example of gene recruitment. Although 94% identical to δ2/ASL in the amino acid sequence, δ1 is enzymatically inactive. A series of hybrid proteins have been constructed to assess the role of each structural domain in the enzymatic mechanism. Five chimeras—221, 122, 121, 211, and 112, where the three numbers correspond to the three structural domains and the value of 1 or 2 represents the protein of origin, δ1 or δ2, respectively—were constructed and thermodynamically and kinetically analyzed. The kinetic analysis indicates that only domain 1 is crucial for restoring ASL activity to δ1 crystallin, and that amino acid substitutions in domain 2 may play a role in substrate binding. These results confirm the hypothesis that only one domain, domain 1, is responsible for the loss of catalytic activity in δ1. The thermodynamic characterization of human ASL (hASL) and duck δ1 and δ2 indicate that δ crystallins are slightly less stable than hASL, with the δ1 being the least stable. The ΔGs of unfolding are 57.25, 63.13, and 70.71 kcal mol−1 for δ1, δ2, and hASL, respectively. This result was unexpected, and we speculate that δ crystallins have adapted to their structural role by adopting a slightly less stable conformation that might allow for enhanced protein–protein and protein–solvent interactions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 The Protein Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)