Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T10:12:37.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2011

David Doherty ,
Conor M. Dowling  and
Michael G. Miller
David Doherty
Affiliation:
Loyola University, Chicago
Conor M. Dowling
Affiliation:
Yale University
Michael G. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Springfield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous analysis finds that people respond differently to “financial” (e.g., tax evasion) and “moral” (e.g., sexual misconduct) political scandals. However, experimental and observational studies tend to reach different conclusions about which type of scandal induces a stronger negative reaction from the public. We use an experiment embedded in a national survey to examine the possibility that these divergent findings can, in part, be explained by a failure to consider the effects of abuses of power. Consistent with previous experimental work, we find that people respond more negatively to financial scandals than to moral scandals when they do not involve abuses of power. However, abuses of power substantially affect responses to both types of scandals. We also find that moral and financial scandals affect personal and job evaluations of a politician differently. These findings support our contention that to understand public responses to scandal, it is crucial to consider the relationship between the scandalous behavior and the official's formal responsibilities.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 749 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1988. “Explaining Senate Election Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82: 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1991. “Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 53: 34–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2010. Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 2009: COMMON CONTENT. [Computer File] Release 2: March 2, 2010. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Intitute of Technology [producer].Google Scholar
Bishin, Benjamin G., Stevens, Daniel, and Wilson, Christian. 2006. “Character Counts? Honesty and Fairness in Election 2000.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70: 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Karp, Jeffrey. 2004. “Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government.” Political Behavior 26: 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lara M. 2001. “The Character of Congress: Scandals in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1966–1996.” PhD diss. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Brown, Lara M. 2006. “Revisiting the Character of Congressional Scandals in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1966–2002.” Journal of Political Marketing 5: 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lara M. 2007. “It's Good to Be an Incumbent: Scandals, Corruption, and the 2006 Midterm Election.” Extension of Remarks, APSA Legislative Studies' Section Newsletter, Vol. 30, No. 1 (January).Google Scholar
Carlson, James, Ganiel, Gladys, and Hyde, Mark S.. 2000. “Scandal and Political Candidate Image.” Southeastern Political Review 28: 747–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Carolyn L. 1996. “The Impact of Scandal on Candidate Evaluations: An Experimental Test of the Role of Candidate Traits.” Political Behavior 18: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groseclose, Timothy, and Krehbiel, Keith. 1994. “Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102nd House.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Dimock, Michael A.. 1994. “Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan. 1980. “The Effects of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 74: 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puglisi, Riccardo, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2008. “Media Coverage of Political Scandals.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Typescript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudin, Ken. 1998. “Congressional Sex Scandals in History.” washingtonpost.com ⟨http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/congress.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John R.. 1997. “The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982–1990.” Journal of Politics 59: 226–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar