Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:44:51.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reforming Campaign Ads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Darrell M. West
Darrell M. West*
Affiliation:
Brown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dissatisfaction with paid campaign advertisements in recent elections has generated heartfelt pleas for fundamental change in the ways elections are conducted. Following the example of Australia and until recently West Germany, some have called for an outright ban on television campaign ads in the United States. Others more worried about the effect on last-minute deciders have suggested the application of the French model, where ads are banned during the closing weeks of the campaign (Schoenbach, 1987: Penniman and Ranney, undated).

These calls undoubtably reflect the deep frustration felt by viewers over the poor educational quality of advertisements in the United States. But it is far too simple to blame ads for these deficiencies. The problem of political commercials is as much a function of campaign structure and voter reactions as candidate behavior. Structural and attitudinal changes in the nature of campaigns have loosened the forces which used to restrain elite strategies. The rise of a mass-based campaign system at a time when candidates have powerful means of influencing viewers creates big incentives for media campaigns. Voters are bombarded with spot ads precisely because of the short-term possibilities evident in recent races (West, 1991a; 1991b).

Since the problem of advertisements goes much deeper than ads themselves, it is unlikely that the elimination of television ads would solve the problems which plague American elections. After all, nonsubstantive appeals by candidates did not originate with television ads in 1952. Fluffy rhetoric has a long tradition in American politics (Jamieson and Campbell, 1988).

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 74 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Jeffrey, Arterton, Christopher, and Orren, Gary. 1988. The Electronic Commonwealth. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bozell, L. Brent and Baker, Brent, eds. 1990. And That's The Way It Isn't. Alexandria, VA: Media Research Center.Google Scholar
Broadcasting. 1989. “House Moves to Curb Violence on TV.” (August 7), p. 69.Google Scholar
Broder, David. 1990. “Five Ways To Put Some Sanity Back in Elections.” Washington Post. (January 14): B1.Google Scholar
Brown, Neil. 1989. “Senators Divide to Proposals to Tame Negative TV Ads.” Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, (July 22): p. 1890.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Fox. 1990. “Dukakis Says Race Was Harmed By TV.” New York Times, (April 22): p. 31.Google Scholar
Caywood, Clarke and Preston, Ivan. 1989. “The Continuing Debate on Political Advertising: Toward a Jeopardy Theory of Political Advertising as Regulated Speech.” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 8, pp. 204–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamarekian, Barbara. 1990. “Ads Aimed at Children Restricted.” New York Times, (October 18), p. D1.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1988. “For Televised Mendacity, This Year is the Worst Ever.” Washington Post, (October 30): C1.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall and Kohrs Campbell, Karlyn. 1988. The Interplay of Influence. 2nd ed., Belmont, CA: Wadworth.Google Scholar
Landler, Mark. 1991. “Suddenly, Green Marketers are Seeing Red Flags.” Business Week, (February 25), pp. 74–76.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Michael. 1990. “TV Is a Player In Crucial Race For California.” New York Times, (April 29), p. 22.Google Scholar
Parisot, Laurence. 1988. “Attitudes About the Media: A Five Country Comparison.” Public Opinion, Vol. 10, no. 5 (January/February), pp. 18–19, 60.Google Scholar
Penniman, Howard and Ranney, Austin undated. “The Regulation of Televised Political Advertising in Six Selected Democracies.” Prepared for the Committee for the Study of the American Electorate.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sabato, Larry. 1988. The Party's Just Begun. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
Schoenbach, Klaus. 1987. “The Role of Mass Media in West German Election Campaigns.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 12, no. 3 (August): pp. 373–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Television Digest, 1988. “Political Ad Rules Aired.” Vol. 28 (September 19), p. 8.Google Scholar
Television Digest, 1990. “Free Air Time Proposal.” Vol. 30 (March 12), p. 4.Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
West, Darrell. 1991a. “Ads and Agenda-Setting in Election Campaigns.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago. April 18–20.Google Scholar
West, Darrell. 1991b. “Ads and Priming in Election Campaigns.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, DC. August 29-September 1.Google Scholar