Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T12:30:12.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Repositioning of American Public Administration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

H. George Frederickson
H. George Frederickson*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Oration
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 701 - 712
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agranoff, Robert, and McGuire, Michael. 1998. “Multinetwork Management: Collaboration and the Hollow State in Local Economic Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8:67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene, and Lesser, Cara. 1996. “Accountability in Human Service Collaboratives—For What? And To Whom?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6:197–224.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, Barry. 1987. All Organizations Are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Brehm, John, and Gates, Scott. 1997. Working, Shirking and Sabatoge: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy. 1994. The Formation of American Local Governments. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caiden, Gerald A. 1994. “Globalizing the Theory and Practice of Public Administration.” In Public Administration in the Global Village, ed. Garcia-Zamor, Jean-Claude and Khator, Renu. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chisolm, Donald. 1989. Coordination without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizalional Systems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cleveland, Harlan. 1972. The Future Executive. New York: Harper & Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3:1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Michael and March, James. 1986. Ambiguity and Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Frederickson, H. George. 1997a. “Beyond the City: Finding Metropolitan Governance in America.” Presented at the annual meeting of the National Academy of Public Administration, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Frederickson, H. George. 1997b. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gilmour, Robert S., and Halley, Alexis A.. 1994. Who Makes Public Policy: The Struggle for Control between Congress and the Executive. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Graham, Cole Blease, and Hays, Steven W.. 1993. Managing the Public Organization. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1964. Beyond the Nation-State: Funetionalism and International Organization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1990. Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Introduetion: Epistemie Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46:1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Thomas H. 1993. “Toward a General Theory of Hicrarehy: Books, Bureaucrats, Baseball Tournaments, and the Administrative Structure of the Nation-State.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3:120–45.Google Scholar
Hammond, Thomas H. 1996. “Formal Theory and Institutions of Governance.” Governance 9:107–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Thomas H., and Knott, Jack H. 1996. “Who Controls the Bureaucracy? Presidential Power, Congressional Dominance, Legal Constraints, and Bureaucratic Autonomy in a Model of Multi-Institutional Policy Making.” Journal of Eaw, Economics and Organization 12:121–68.Google Scholar
Hammond, Thomas H., and Knott, Jack H. 1999. “Political Institutions, Public Management, and Policy Choice,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9: 33–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanf, Kenneth I. 1994. The International Context of Environmental Management from the Negotiating Table to the Shop Floor. Breukelen, Netherlands: Nijenrode University Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. 1977. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, Mathew Jr. 1964. “The Governance of the Metropolis as a Problem in Diplomacy.” The Journal of Polities 26:627–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher, and Jackson, Michael. 1991. Administrative Argument. Brooksfield, VT: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Mark. Forthcoming. “Onto a Darkling Plain: Globalization and the American Public Service in the Twenty-First Century.” In The Future of Merit, ed. Pfiffner, James and Brook, Douglas. Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Press and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hufen, J.A.M., and Ringling, A.B., eds. 1990. Beleidsnetwerber. The Hague: VUGA.Google Scholar
Hull, Christopher, and Hjern, Benny. 1987. Helping Small Firms Grow. London: Groom Helm.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 1988. Government by Proxy: (Mis?)Managing Federal Programs. Washington, DC: CO Press.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 1993. Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
LaPorte, Todd R. 1996. “Shifting Vantage and Conceptual Puzzles in Understanding Public Organization Networks.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6:49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Paul C. 1995. Thickening Government: Federal Hierarchies and the Diffusion of Accountability. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. 1999. The True Size of Government. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majorilarian and Consensus Government. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likert, Rensis. 1967. The Human Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Luke, Jeffrey S., and Caiden, Gerald A., 1989. “Coping with Global Interdependence.” In Handbook of Public Administration, ed. Perry, James L. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E. Jr. 1996. Public Management as Art, Science and Profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E. Jr., Heinrich, Carolyn, and Hill, Carolyn J. 1999. “The Empirical Study of Governance: Theories, Models, Methods.” Presented at the Workshop on Models and Methods for the Empirical Study of Governance, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78:734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. 1997. Greed, Chaos and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John. 1990. “Bargaining Costs, Influence Costs, and the Organization of Economic Activity.” In Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, ed. Alt, James E. and Shemple, Kenneth A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milward, Brinton H. 1994. “Nonprofit Contracting and the Hollow State.” Public Administration Review 54:1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milward, Brinton H. 1996. “Symposium on the Hollow State: Capacity. Control, and Performance in Interorganizational Settings.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6:193–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalbandian, John. 1991. Professionalism in Local Government: Transformations in the Roles, Responsibilities and Values of City Managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Osborne, David, and Gaebler, Ted. 1999. Reinventing Government. Reading, MA Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1987. “Institutional Arrangements for Resolving the Common Dilemma: Some Contending Approaches.” In The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, ed. McKay, Bonnie M. and Acheson, James M.. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
O'Toole, Laurence J. 1993. “Multiorganizational Policy Implementation: Some Limitations and Possibilities for Rational-Choice Contributions.” In Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions, ed. Scharpf, Fritz W. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
O'Toole, Laurence J. 1997. “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 57:45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Toole, Laurence J. 1997. “The Implications for Democracy in a Networked Bureau cratic World.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7:443–59.Google Scholar
O'Toole, Laurence J., and Meier, Kenneth J. 1999. “Modeling the Impact of Public Management: Implications of Structural Content.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouchi, William C. 1984. The M-Form Society: How American Teamwork Can Capture the Competitive Edge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. 1998. “Governance without Government? Rethinking Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theoiy 8:223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Walter W. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, ed. Staw, B. and Cummings, L. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and DiMaggio, Paul J., eds. 1991. The New Institulionalism and Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, Hal, and Steinbauer, Paula. 1999. “Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theoiy 9:1–32.Google Scholar
Sable, Charles F. 1993. “Constitutional Ordering in Historical Context.” In Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions, ed. Sharpf, Fritz W. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M., ed. 1989. Beyond Privatization: The Tasks of Government Action. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1977. “Does Organization Matter? Task Structure and Interaction in the Ministerial Bureaucracy.” Organization and Administration Science 8:149–168.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1989. “Decision Rules, Decision Styles, and Policy Choices.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 1(2): 149–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1993. “Coordination in Hierarchies and Networks.” In Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to lite Study of Governance Institutions, Scharpf, Fritz W. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York.Google Scholar
Strange, S. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Craig W. 1997. “Public Management as Interagency Cooperation: Testing Epistemie Community Theory at the Domestic Level.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7:221–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent, and Rockman, Bert A., eds. 1993. Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Weiss, Janet. 1990. “Control in School Organizations: Theoretical Perspectives,” In Choice and Control in American Education, ed. Clune, William H. and Witte, John F. New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar