Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:44:04.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Approaches to Development Politics and the Quest for a More Robust Theory: New Institutions of Governance in Chicago and Berlin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2019

Annika Marlen Hinze Open the ORCID record for Annika Marlen Hinze [Opens in a new window]  and
James M. Smith
Annika Marlen Hinze*
Affiliation:
Fordham University
James M. Smith*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, South Bend
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Toward an Urban Policy Analysis
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 10 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2020 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bader, Ingo, and Bialluch, Martin. 2009. “Gentrification and the Creative Class in Berlin-Kreuzberg.” In Whose Urban Renaissance? An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies, ed. Porter, Libby and Shaw, Kate, 96–99. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chicago Infrastructure Trust. 2016. “Financial Statements and Independent Auditors’ Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2016.” Available at http://chicagoinfrastructure.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/2016-CIT-FS_Audit_Report-FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Chicago Infrastructure Trust. 2018. “How it Works.” Available at http://chicagoinfrastructure.org/about/how-it-works.Google Scholar
Die Tageszeitung. 2008. “Bürgerentscheid erfolgreich: Mediaspree ist Ufer los.” taz—Die Tageszeitung, July 13, 2008. https://taz.de/Buergerentscheid-erfolgreich/!5179058/.Google Scholar
Dilworth, Richardson (ed.). 2009. The City in American Political Development. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203881101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisinger, Peter K. 1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review 67 (1): 11–28.10.2307/1958525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class...and How It Is Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ingram, Helen, and Schneider, Anne L.. 1990. “Improving Implementation through Framing Smarter Statutes.” Journal of Public Policy 10 (1): 66–87.10.1017/S0143814X00004682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, Helen, and Schneider, Anne L.. 1991. “The Choice of Target Populations.” Administration and Society 23 (November): 333–56.10.1177/009539979102300304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, Helen, Schneider, Anne L., and Deleon, Peter. 2007. “Social Construction and Policy Design.” In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Sabatier, Paul A., 93–126. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lowndes, Vivien. 2001. “Rescuing Aunt Sally: Taking Institutional Theory Seriously in Urban Politics.” Urban Studies 38 (11): 1953–71.10.1080/00420980120080871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, Christine. 2007. “Lobbying Success in the United States and the European Union.” Journal of Public Policy 27 (1): 35–56.10.1017/S0143814X07000608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, Christine, and Baumgartner, Frank. 2008. “Converging Perspectives on Interest-Group Research in Europe and America.” West European Politics 31 (6): 1253–73. DOI:10.1080/01402380802372688.10.1080/01402380802372688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novy, Johannes, and Colomb, Claire. 2013. “Struggling for the Right to the (Creative) City in Berlin and Hamburg: New Urban Social Movements, New ‘Spaces of Hope’?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (5): 1816– 38.10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01115.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, Jon. 1999. “Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics.” Urban Affairs Review 38 (3): 372–96.10.1177/10780879922183988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapotichne, Joshua, and Smith, James M.. 2012. “Venue Shopping and Urban Development: Lessons from Chicago and Seattle.” Urban Affairs Review 48 (1): 86–110.10.1177/1078087411420373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharenberg, Albert, and Bader, Ingo. 2010. “Berlin’s Waterfront Site Struggle.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Policy, and Action 13 (2–3): 325–35.10.1080/13604810902982938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1988. “Systematically Pinching Ideas: A Comparative Approach to Policy Design.” Journal of Public Policy 8 (1): 61–80.10.1017/S0143814X00006851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347.10.2307/2939044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Elaine B. 1991. “Institutional Manifestations of Accessibility and Urban Economic Development Polity.” Western Political Quarterly 44 (1): 129–47.10.2307/448751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, James M. 2010. “‘Re-stating’ Theories of Urban Development: The Politics of Authority Creation and Intergovernmental Triads in Post-Industrial Chicago.” Journal of Urban Affairs 32 (4): 425–48.10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00497.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. 1976. Economic Growth and Neighborhood Discontent. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. 2001. “The Atlanta Experience Re-Examined: The Link between Agenda and Regime Change.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25 (1): 20–34.10.1111/1468-2427.00295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. 2015. “Reflections on Regime Politics: From Governing Coalition to Urban Political Order.” Urban Affairs Review 51 (1): 101–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1996. “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer, 41–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803987.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar