Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:17:24.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Democratic Dilemma Then and Now

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2019

James N. Druckman*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Reflections on The Democratic Dilemma
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aberbach, Joel D. 1990. Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1999. “Arthur Lupia and Mathew D. McCubbins, The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Public Choice 101: 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Matthew A., and Kernell, Samuel. 1999. “Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television?American Political Science Review 93: 99114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89: 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, Paul M. 1995. The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul: A Philosophical Journey into the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Vincent P., and Sobel, Joel. 1982. “Strategic Information Transmission.” Econometrica 50: 1431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobkin, Donald S. 2008. “The Rise of the Administrative State: A Prescription for Lawlessness.” Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 17: 362–85.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100: 627–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, John H., Holyoak, Keith J., Nisbett, Richard E., and Thagard, Paul R.. 1986. Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel, and Jacobson, Gary C.. 1999. The Logic of American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., Metlay, Daniel S., and Kay, W. D.. 1982. “Citizen Knowledge and Choices on the Complex Issue of Nuclear Energy.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 615–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1992. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control and the Power of Information.” American Political Science Review 86: 390404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88: 6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L., eds. 2000. Elements of Reason: Understanding and Expanding the Limits of Political Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1994. “Learning from Oversight: Fire Alarms and Police Patrols Reconstructed.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 10: 96125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2001. “A Response to Austen-Smith.” Public Choice 106: 183–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Strøm, Kaare. 1995. “Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 89: 648–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Phillip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, Betsy, Liu, Jenny, and Wegner, Daniel M.. 2011. “Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips.” Science 333: 776–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, Michael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 355–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber. Translated by Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., and Moran, Mark J.. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission.” Journal of Political Economy 91: 765800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar