Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:36:27.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Explaining Increased Contestation in the 2018 State Legislative Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2020

Adam S. Myers*
Affiliation:
Providence College

Extract

State legislative elections in the United States have long exhibited relatively low contestation rates. Between 2002 and 2016, for example, the percentage of state legislative seats fully contested by the two major parties in even-year elections never reached more than 63.6% and was as low as 54.6%.1 Indeed, some states always see fewer than one third of their legislative seats contested. It is not surprising that local media around the country routinely lament the low level of competition in statehouse races.2

Type
Symposium: State Legislative Elections of 2018
Copyright
© American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowen, Daniel, and Green, Zachary. 2018. “Legislative Professionalism Component Scores, 1973–2014.” Harvard Dataverse. Available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/27595. Accessed November 30, 2019.Google Scholar
Brogan, Dylan. 2018. “No Contest.” Isthmus, November 15. Available at https://isthmus.com/news/news/dems-sweep-statewide-offices-in-midterms-but-remain-underrepresented-in-assembly. Accessed December 16, 2019.Google Scholar
Hartford Courant. 2016. “Too Many Uncontested Races for CT Legislature.” July 21. Available at www.courant.com/opinion/op-ed/hc-ed-too-many-ct-seats-uncontested-0721-20160720-story.html. Accessed December 16, 2019.Google Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 2004. “Challenger Emergence, Incumbent Success, and Electoral Accountability in State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 66 (4): 1283–303.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Breaux, David. 1988. “The Effect of Incumbency on State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (4): 495514.10.2307/439781Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl. 2010. “Forecasting the 2010 State Legislative Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (4): 643–48.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl. 2013. “State Partisan Balance Data, 1937–2011.” Harvard Dataverse. Available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:1902.1/20403. Accessed November 30, 2019.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl. 2015. “Competitiveness in State Legislative Elections: 1972–2014.” Ballotpedia. Available at https://ballotpedia.org/Competitiveness_in_State_Legislative_Elections:_1972-2014. Accessed December 16, 2019.Google Scholar
Makse, Todd. 2014. “The Redistricting Cycle, Partisan Tides, and Party Strategy in State Legislative Elections.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 14 (3): 342–63.10.1177/1532440014537503Google Scholar
Millman, Noah. 2017. “The Dangers of the Democrats’ Suburban Strategy.” The Week, November 10. Available at https://theweek.com/articles/736332/dangers-democrats-suburban-strategy. Accessed September 11, 2019.Google Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F. 1998. “Candidate Spending in State Legislative Races.” In Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections, ed. Thompson, Joel A. and Moncrief, Gary F., 3758. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, David. 2018. “Suburban Voters Gave Democrats Their House Majority.” CityLab. Available at www.citylab.com/equity/2018/11/house-races-election-results-democrats-suburbs-blue-wave/575287. Accessed September 11, 2019.Google Scholar
Myers, Adam S. 2016. “Electoral Incongruence and Delayed Republican Gains in Southern State Legislatures.” American Review of Politics 35 (2): 73102.10.15763/issn.2374-779X.2016.35.2.73-102Google Scholar
Myers, Adam S. 2018. “Changing Patterns of Uncontested Seats in Southern State Legislative Elections, 1984–2012.” Social Science Quarterly 99 (2): 583–98.10.1111/ssqu.12409Google Scholar
Providence Journal. 2016. “Rhode Island’s Pathetic Republican Party.” November 27. Available at www.providencejournal.com/opinion/20161127/editorial-ris-pathetic-republican-party. Accessed December 16, 2019.Google Scholar
Rogers, Steven M. 2015. “Strategic Challenger Entry in a Federal System: The Role of Economic and Political Conditions in State Legislative Competition.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 539–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Steven M. 2016. “National Forces in State Legislative Elections.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667:207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Elena. 2018. “Democrats Face Key Test of Trump-Era Suburban Strategy.” Politico, March 30. Available at www.politico.com/story/2018/03/20/illinois-democrats-suburban-republicans-roskam-473002. Accessed September 11, 2019.Google Scholar
Shafer, Byron E., and Johnston, Richard. 2006. The End of Southern Exceptionalism: Class, Race, and Partisan Change in the Postwar South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Slowik, Ted. 2016. “Uncontested Elections Underscore Need for Redistricting Reform.” Chicago Tribune, March 16. Available at www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/daily-southtown/opinion/ct-sta-slowik-uncontested-st-0317-20160316-story.html. Accessed December 16, 2019.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2000. “Uncontested Seats in State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (1): 131–46.10.2307/440396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dunk, Emily, and Weber, Ronald E.. 1997. “Constituency-Level Competition in the US States, 1968–1988: A Pooled Analysis.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22:141–59.10.2307/440379Google Scholar
Wrighton, J. Mark, and Squire, Peverill. 1997. “Uncontested Seats and Electoral Competition for the US House of Representatives over Time.” Journal of Politics 59:452–68.10.1017/S0022381600053524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Myers supplementary material

Appendix

Download Myers supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 65.1 KB