Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:07:41.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Facing Failure: The Use (and Abuse) of Rejection in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2006

Gregory Weeks
Gregory Weeks
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Not long ago, I received a packet of papers, the contents of which explained why my latest article submission was rejected by a well-known peer-reviewed journal. Like everyone else, I've been in this position before, but this time two things led me to more contemplation than usual. First, it was the first rejection since I received tenure, and I noted that job security did little to dampen my disappointment. Second, it came very shortly after I ran into a senior colleague, who noted fairly casually that two of his articles had just been turned down, one of them by a top political science journal.

Type
THE PROFESSION
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , October 2006 , pp. 879 - 882
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedeian, Arthur G. 2003. “The Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors.” Journal of Management Inquiry 12 (4): 331–8.Google Scholar
Bonjean, Charles M., and Jan Hullum. 1978. “Reasons for Journal Rejection: An Analysis of 600 Manuscripts.” PS: Political Science and Politics 11 (Autumn): 480–3.Google Scholar
Borer, Douglas A. 1997. “The Ugly Process of Journal Submissions: A Call for Reform.” PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (September): 558–60.Google Scholar
Campbell, John P. 1995. “ Editorial: Some Remarks From the Outgoing Editors.” In Publishing in the Organizational Sciences (2nd edition), eds. L. L. Cumings and Peter J. Frost. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 269–83.
Chew, F.S. 1991. “Fate of Manuscripts Rejected for Publication in the AJR.” American Journal of Roentgenology 156: 627–32.Google Scholar
Fyfe, James J. 1994. “ Cops and Robbers in Academe: Editing Justice Quarterly.” In Editors as Gatekeepers: Getting Published in the Social Sciences, eds. Rita J. Simon and James J. Fyfe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 59–72.
Green, Robert G. 1998. “Faculty Rank, Effort and Success: A Study of Publication in Professional Journals.” Journal of Social Work Education 34 (fall): 415–26.Google Scholar
Guest, Avery M. 1994. “ Gatekeeping among the Demographers.” In Editors as Gatekeepers: Getting Published in the Social Sciences, eds. Rita J. Simon and James J. Fyfe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 85–105.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Dena Levy. 1993. “Correlates of Publication Success: Some AJPS Results.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (September): 558–61.Google Scholar
Marwell, G. 1992. “Let's Train Reviewers.” American Sociological Review 57: 3–4.Google Scholar
Miner, John B. 1997. “Participating in Profound Change.” Academy of Management Journal 40 (6): 1420–8.Google Scholar
Miner, John B. 2003. “Commentary on Arthur Bedeian's ‘The Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors.’” Journal of Management Inquiry 12 (4): 339–43.Google Scholar
Morse, Janice M. 2004. “Editorial: When Persistence Wears Thin.” Qualitative Health Research 14 (March): 297–8.Google Scholar
Nemery, B. 2001. “What Happens to the Manuscripts That Have Not Been Accepted in Occupational and Environmental Medicine?” Occupational and Environmental Medicine 58 (September): 604–7.Google Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., and Shannon K. Smithey. 1990. “Monitoring Scholarly Journal Publication in Political Science: The Role of the APSR.” PS: Political Science and Politics 23 (4): 647–56.Google Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C. 1994. “ The Itch to Publish in Political Science.” In Editors as Gatekeepers: Getting Published in the Social Sciences, eds. Rita J. Simon and James J. Fyfe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 3–19.
Ray, J., M. Berkwits, and F. Davidoff. 2000. “The Fate of Manuscripts Rejected by a General Medical Journal.” Annals of Internal Medicine 109 (August): 162–3.Google Scholar
Romanelli, Elaine. 1995. “ Becoming a Reviewer: Lessons Somewhat Painfully Learned.” In Publishing in the Organizational Sciences, 2nd edition, eds. L. L. Cumings and Peter J. Frost. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 195–202.
Weick, Karl E. 1995. “ Editing Innovation into Administrative Science Quarterly.” In Publishing in the Organizational Sciences, 2nd edition, eds. L. L. Cumings and Peter J. Frost. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 284–96.