Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:02:49.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Good Symbolic Representation: The Relevance of Inclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2018

Emanuela Lombardo  and
Petra Meier
Emanuela Lombardo
Affiliation:
Madrid Complutense University
Petra Meier
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Good Representative 2.0
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 327 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Daily Mail. 2005. “Controversial Statue Unveiled in Trafalgar Square”. http://dailym.ai/2m3USP8. Accessed March 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2012. “The Impurity of Representation and the Vitality of Democracy.” Cultural Studies 26 (2-3): 207–22.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2015. “The ‘Constructivist Turn’ in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead-End?” Constellations 22 (4): 487–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2007. The Good Representative. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2000. “Rethinking Recognition.” New Left Review 3: 107–20.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Simon. 2010. “National Symbols and National Identity: Currency and Constructing Cosmopolitans in Tunisia.” Identities 17 (2): 228–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, David. 1988. Ritual, Politics, and Power. New Haven and London, UK: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lombardo, Emanuela, and Meier, Petra. 2014. The Symbolic Representation of Gender: A Discursive Approach. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lyall, Sarah. 2005. “In Trafalgar Square, Much ado about Statuary.” New York Times. https://nyti.ms/2m3LGue. Accessed March 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
Millett, Ann. 2008. “Sculpting Body Ideals: Alison Lapper Pregnant and the Public Display of Disability.” Disability Studies Quarterly 28 (3): online http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/122/122. Accessed March 10, 2017.Google Scholar
Parkinson, John. 2009. “Symbolic Representation in Public Space: Capital Cities, Presence and Memory.” Representation 45 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1995. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. California: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puwar, Nirmal. 2004. Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin (ed.). 2011. Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5 (3): 297–318.Google Scholar
Williams, Melissa. 2000. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina, and Campbell, David. 2017. “Role Models Revisited: Youth, Novelty, and the Impact of Female Candidates.” Politics, Groups and Identities 5 (3): 418–34.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar